Asset 1

Global Go To Think Tank Index (GGTTI) 2020 launched                    111,75 Think Tanks across the world ranked in different categories.                SDPI is ranked 90th among “Top Think Tanks Worldwide (non-US)”.           SDPI stands 11th among Top Think Tanks in South & South East Asia & the Pacific (excluding India).            SDPI notches 33rd position in “Best New Idea or Paradigm Developed by A Think Tank” category.                SDPI remains 42nd in “Best Quality Assurance and Integrity Policies and Procedure” category.              SDPI stands 49th in “Think Tank to Watch in 2020”.            SDPI gets 52nd position among “Best Independent Think Tanks”.                           SDPI becomes 63rd in “Best Advocacy Campaign” category.                   SDPI secures 60th position in “Best Institutional Collaboration Involving Two or More Think Tanks” category.                       SDPI obtains 64th position in “Best Use of Media (Print & Electronic)” category.               SDPI gains 66th position in “Top Environment Policy Tink Tanks” category.                SDPI achieves 76th position in “Think Tanks With Best External Relations/Public Engagement Program” category.                    SDPI notches 99th position in “Top Social Policy Think Tanks”.            SDPI wins 140th position among “Top Domestic Economic Policy Think Tanks”.               SDPI is placed among special non-ranked category of Think Tanks – “Best Policy and Institutional Response to COVID-19”.                                            Owing to COVID-19 outbreak, SDPI staff is working from home from 9am to 5pm five days a week. All our staff members are available on phone, email and/or any other digital/electronic modes of communication during our usual official hours. You can also find all our work related to COVID-19 in orange entries in our publications section below.    The Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) is pleased to announce its Twenty-third Sustainable Development Conference (SDC) from 14 – 17 December 2020 in Islamabad, Pakistan. The overarching theme of this year’s Conference is Sustainable Development in the Times of COVID-19. Read more…       FOOD SECIRITY DASHBOARD: On 4th Nov, SDPI has shared the first prototype of Food Security Dashboard with Dr Moeed Yousaf, the Special Assistant to Prime Minister on  National Security and Economic Outreach in the presence of stakeholders, including Ministry of National Food Security and Research. Provincial and district authorities attended the event in person or through zoom. The dashboard will help the government monitor and regulate the supply chain of essential food commodities.

COUNTRY NEEDS TRADE, INVESTMENT NOT AID

Since independence, Pakistan has been struggling to cope with political and macroeconomic instability and has been relying on foreign aid and other capital inflows. But because of inconsistent macroeconomic policies, millions of people have been thrown into the ranks of the poor and the country has not been able to help them.

According to the latest World Bank report entitled World Development Indicators 2013, 60% of Pakistan’s population is living below the poverty line, of which 21% households are found to be extremely poor which live on less than $1.25 per day.

Pakistan is one of the biggest victims of terrorism after the 9/11 incidents. With a loss of 50,000 lives and about $100 billion in economic terms, Pakistan is the only country which has suffered that much. Furthermore, food insecurity, acute energy shortages, devastating floods and growing extremism are adding fuel to the fire.

Foreign aid accounts for a larger share in foreign capital flows into Pakistan, which are supposed to accelerate growth and development in the country. However, in the presence of poorly crafted policies, foreign assistance has no significant effect on economic growth and development.

Though foreign aid and capital inflows leave some positive effect on the gross domestic product (GDP), economic growth increases at a slow pace. On the other hand, foreign capital flows have a negative impact on the economy as well.

Studies show that the amount of external debt increases with a rise in foreign capital inflows, which is largely the result of macroeconomic mismanagement, mis-utilisation of assistance and inappropriate policies.

A study of the trend in the past few decades suggests that foreign aid increased during the period 1980 to 2002, but the country was caught in a debt trap. The rise in external debt was mainly due to shift in the composition of foreign aid from grants to hard loans. External debt has also risen exponentially from 2002 to date.

Besides, there is no significant improvement on the social front. This is because a major share of foreign assistance goes to repayment of loans and debt servicing and very little is spent on education, infrastructure, healthcare, population welfare and other social spheres.

Now, Pakistan must opt for a new mantra “No more aid but trade”. A question arises whether Pakistan is capable of steering itself out of the economic mess and the vicious circle of poverty when trade goes up?

It is a proven fact that trade brings down poverty level all over the world. Many studies indicate that opening up of trade has a positive and significant impact on poverty reduction. So the world is becoming more integrated and goods and services are crossing borders in line with globalisation and regionalisation processes.

Additionally, free trade agreements among regional economies like the European Union (EU) bloc have caused an increase in people’s welfare and decrease in poverty in the region. This negates the commonly held perception that developing countries and under-developed states need foreign aid to combat economic woes and achieve growth and development.

This article was originally published at: The Express Tribune

The opinions expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint or stance of SDPI.