Asset 1

Global Go To Think Tank Index (GGTTI) 2020 launched                    111,75 Think Tanks across the world ranked in different categories.                SDPI is ranked 90th among “Top Think Tanks Worldwide (non-US)”.           SDPI stands 11th among Top Think Tanks in South & South East Asia & the Pacific (excluding India).            SDPI notches 33rd position in “Best New Idea or Paradigm Developed by A Think Tank” category.                SDPI remains 42nd in “Best Quality Assurance and Integrity Policies and Procedure” category.              SDPI stands 49th in “Think Tank to Watch in 2020”.            SDPI gets 52nd position among “Best Independent Think Tanks”.                           SDPI becomes 63rd in “Best Advocacy Campaign” category.                   SDPI secures 60th position in “Best Institutional Collaboration Involving Two or More Think Tanks” category.                       SDPI obtains 64th position in “Best Use of Media (Print & Electronic)” category.               SDPI gains 66th position in “Top Environment Policy Tink Tanks” category.                SDPI achieves 76th position in “Think Tanks With Best External Relations/Public Engagement Program” category.                    SDPI notches 99th position in “Top Social Policy Think Tanks”.            SDPI wins 140th position among “Top Domestic Economic Policy Think Tanks”.               SDPI is placed among special non-ranked category of Think Tanks – “Best Policy and Institutional Response to COVID-19”.                                            Owing to COVID-19 outbreak, SDPI staff is working from home from 9am to 5pm five days a week. All our staff members are available on phone, email and/or any other digital/electronic modes of communication during our usual official hours. You can also find all our work related to COVID-19 in orange entries in our publications section below.    The Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) is pleased to announce its Twenty-third Sustainable Development Conference (SDC) from 14 – 17 December 2020 in Islamabad, Pakistan. The overarching theme of this year’s Conference is Sustainable Development in the Times of COVID-19. Read more…       FOOD SECIRITY DASHBOARD: On 4th Nov, SDPI has shared the first prototype of Food Security Dashboard with Dr Moeed Yousaf, the Special Assistant to Prime Minister on  National Security and Economic Outreach in the presence of stakeholders, including Ministry of National Food Security and Research. Provincial and district authorities attended the event in person or through zoom. The dashboard will help the government monitor and regulate the supply chain of essential food commodities.

ENERGY AND SECURITY

THE CRISIS in Pakistan’s energy sector is no longer confined to worsening the country’s grim industrial crisis and deepening its social chaos. It has now come to a point where it has begun to pose challenges to the country’s national security. The daily load-shedding of six to eight hours in the urban areas and 12-18 hours in the rural areas has led to significant vulnerabilities that are now rapidly leading to political instability. At a time when the country is fighting a war against terrorism, and with the energy shortage worsening unemployment in the failing industrial sector, riots triggered by chronic power cuts have created the perfect environment for widespread violence and civil disturbance.

Pakistan, which had a surplus of electricity in 2002, is now short of more than 5,500 MW. Its present peak demand is 18,100 MW. The annual rate of growth in electricity consumption was 3 percent in 2003. It rose to 10 percent in 2008 because of economic growth and the continuous unplanned rural electrification under local political pressures. The government’s failure to anticipate this galloping growth rate is one of the other major causes of Pakistan’s energy crisis.

The fundamental cause is Pakistan’s increasing dependence on fossil fuels for energy generation. The country has the capacity to generate almost 17,500 MW of electricity but the system is not working to full capacity because of the spike in the cost of generation. The severe shortage of gas is coupled with the skyrocketing cost of imported furnace oil, to which thermal power plants have been forced to switch to meet the gas shortage. Pakistan, with its crippled economy already crippled, is in addition overburdened with huge bills for the import of furnace oil.

Pakistan’s daily gas requirement is 6.5 billion cubic feet (BCF), against its current supply of 4 BCF, a shortfall of 2.5 BCF. The major consumer of gas is the power sector, which consumes nearly 40 per cent of the total production of gas. Among other things, this is causing the depletion of our limited gas reserves.

Because of these reasons, the cost of provision of electricity to consumers could not be fully recovered, while at the same time the tariff for consumers remained unchanged from 2002 to 2007. In early 2007 the government increased the electricity tariff but could not pass the whole cost of production onto the consumers. The gap in the cost of electricity generation and government-notified tariff swelled to Rs3.39 per unit in 2010.

The gas crisis and the shift towards oil use for generation of power, coupled with the inability of the power distributions companies to pass on the cost of electricity to consumers, have turned the power sector hostage to circular debt. The dependency on fossil fuel pushed the country’s power sector into a grave dilemma which it has no means of resolving at the moment: if it power plants run on oil, they cause circular debt; if they do not, the only alternative is large-scale load-shedding.

The energy crisis had already been piling up when in March 2008 rental power plants (RPPs) were a panacea for the energy crisis. The federal cabinet approved installation of 14 rental power plants for the generation of 2,700 MW. The rental power plants, which are only contributing 68 megawatts to the national grid, turned into a mega corruption scandal and the country’s energy crisis only deepened. The country has to pay a very high cost, but the gas shortage has sent the cost of electricity generation skyrocketing.

This was the Himalayan blunder committed by government. Hydroelectricity, the cheapest and most environment-friendly source of energy, was not considered, let alone it’s receiving the priority it deserved in government planning. Hydroelectricity generation were the dominant of power production, the government could have achieved the objective of consumer-end tariffs at affordable levels while also meeting the true cost of electricity production.

Whenever the question about hydroelectricity is raised, the Ministry of Water and Power has always come up with the response that hydropower projects take a long time to build and need huge capital investment. But this is a rather weak argument in view of modern hydropower project management.

In our own neighbourhood, Indian policymakers are working towards adding 50,000 MW of clean and renewable hydropower to their energy mix and have resultantly set some significant records in this regard. Many public-sector hydropower projects – for instance, the 520 MW Omkareshwar project on the Narmada River – has been completed in four years. Small hydropower projects are taking 20 to 22 months for completion.

However, on top of the list of excellent hydropower project management is the 86 MW Malana hydroelectric power project in Himachal Pradesh. It is unique because it was constructed within 30 months against its five-year schedule, and at almost 50 per cent the original cost in the approved budget – and that too on difficult mountainous terrain at high altitude.

In Pakistan, the Ministry of Water and Power deliberated with stakeholders for two-and-a-half years and finally brought out a power generation policy in 2002, under which run-of-rivers hydropower projects were planned for the addition of 4,325 MW of electricity, and funds and the schedules were determined accordingly. However, only two projects were completed in nine years. All these projects were delayed, and the delay resulted in the serious energy crisis in the country. Had the projects been implemented according to plan, Pakistan would have had 4,325 MW of cheap hydroelectricity.

The abnormal and deliberate delay in hydropower projects and wastage of heavy foreign exchange on Rental Power Plants (RPPs) is not the only crime of the Ministry of Water and Power. In 2008, when the government was finding it difficult to lure foreign investment to overcome increasing energy shortfalls, an entrepreneur requested the ministry for permission to start the 600-MW Mahl hydropower plant which was advertised by the Board of Investment (BOI) for private-sector investment. The private entrepreneur arranged 800 million dollars for the generation and sale of electricity at just Rs4 per unit. This was sabotaged by the adviser to the Ministry of Water and Power.

As a last resort, the investor published an appeal to the President and Prime Minister on March 27, 2010, requesting them to intervene to enable the development of the Mahl hydropower project. He has never had a reply from either. However, in April 2011, the adviser to the Ministry of Water and Power sent another demand to the Friends of Pakistan seeking funds of $37 billion for hydropower projects, including Mahl. Development of hydropower is the only solution to the Pakistani energy crisis. The government’s failure to address the energy crisis shows that some elements in the government who have their own plans.

If Pakistan is to prosper, the country urgently needs honest, dedicated and sincere leaders, ministers and advisers who can help create an enabling competitive environment for the private sector to participate in investment in the field of power generation without fear.

The author can be reached at ahabasi@gmail.com

This article was originally published at: Technology Times

The opinions expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint or stance of SDPI.