Asset 1

Global Go To Think Tank Index (GGTTI) 2020 launched                    111,75 Think Tanks across the world ranked in different categories.                SDPI is ranked 90th among “Top Think Tanks Worldwide (non-US)”.           SDPI stands 11th among Top Think Tanks in South & South East Asia & the Pacific (excluding India).            SDPI notches 33rd position in “Best New Idea or Paradigm Developed by A Think Tank” category.                SDPI remains 42nd in “Best Quality Assurance and Integrity Policies and Procedure” category.              SDPI stands 49th in “Think Tank to Watch in 2020”.            SDPI gets 52nd position among “Best Independent Think Tanks”.                           SDPI becomes 63rd in “Best Advocacy Campaign” category.                   SDPI secures 60th position in “Best Institutional Collaboration Involving Two or More Think Tanks” category.                       SDPI obtains 64th position in “Best Use of Media (Print & Electronic)” category.               SDPI gains 66th position in “Top Environment Policy Tink Tanks” category.                SDPI achieves 76th position in “Think Tanks With Best External Relations/Public Engagement Program” category.                    SDPI notches 99th position in “Top Social Policy Think Tanks”.            SDPI wins 140th position among “Top Domestic Economic Policy Think Tanks”.               SDPI is placed among special non-ranked category of Think Tanks – “Best Policy and Institutional Response to COVID-19”.                                            Owing to COVID-19 outbreak, SDPI staff is working from home from 9am to 5pm five days a week. All our staff members are available on phone, email and/or any other digital/electronic modes of communication during our usual official hours. You can also find all our work related to COVID-19 in orange entries in our publications section below.    The Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) is pleased to announce its Twenty-third Sustainable Development Conference (SDC) from 14 – 17 December 2020 in Islamabad, Pakistan. The overarching theme of this year’s Conference is Sustainable Development in the Times of COVID-19. Read more…       FOOD SECIRITY DASHBOARD: On 4th Nov, SDPI has shared the first prototype of Food Security Dashboard with Dr Moeed Yousaf, the Special Assistant to Prime Minister on  National Security and Economic Outreach in the presence of stakeholders, including Ministry of National Food Security and Research. Provincial and district authorities attended the event in person or through zoom. The dashboard will help the government monitor and regulate the supply chain of essential food commodities.

Daily Times

Published Date: Jul 10, 2012

COUNTER THERAPY SUGGESTED FOR HALTING BRAIN DRAIN FROM LOW-INCOME NATIONS

The high-income nations are draining the highly-educated subjects of the low-income countries and the latter are feeling more pain by the day, a sitting was told on Monday.

“There is a substantial pain that the low-income countries suffer due to emigration of highly-educated people to high-income countries. This pain can be converted into gain if the states play a proactive role to tap the potentials of the highly-educated diaspora,” said US’s Mount Holyoke College Visiting Professor of Economics and former Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) executive director Dr Shahrukh Rafi Khan.

He was speaking at a special lecture on ‘Highly-educated Emigration from Low-income Countries: Turning Pain to Gain.’ It was organised by SDPI to commemorate its 20th anniversary celebrations. SDPI Executive Director Dr Abid Qaiyum Suleri moderated the proceedings.

Refuting the aid agencies’ argument of lack of capacity in the low-income countries, Dr Rafi suggested that tapping the expatriate community would be cheaper because of the element of volunteerism and aspiration to serve their country and more effective given the linguistic and cultural advantages.

He argued that the monetary returns are likely to be higher in high-income countries but the social costs of migration is far greater than the social benefits. He was of the view both push and pull factors directly affect the process of emigration. He said the most important pull factor behind the high-education migration is the wage differential.

However, the better social facilities, social and workplace freedoms, and opportunities for children also contribute massively in this process.

He said that some of the push factors in LICs hinder individuals from realising their productive potential besides social and political chaos, conflicts, or civil insecurity induced by inefficient policing and legal mechanisms play important role in encouraging the emigration trends.

Dr Rafi argued there is very high cost attached to emigration of highly skilled persons for a society. Such emigration affects country’s growth potential as loss of highly educated people reduces the economic growth rates, which has a strong relevance with prosperity.

He said the costs of subsidised higher education are borne by the home country and hence the migration represents a loss of social investment since the benefits accrue to the host country.

He further added that as people in the upper tax brackets leave the country, therefore, cause reduction in tax revenues for the source country. He termed the remittances a mixed blessing because they overvalue exchange rate and subsequently hurt the exports and result into de-industrialisation.