Asset 1

Global Go To Think Tank Index (GGTTI) 2020 launched                    111,75 Think Tanks across the world ranked in different categories.                SDPI is ranked 90th among “Top Think Tanks Worldwide (non-US)”.           SDPI stands 11th among Top Think Tanks in South & South East Asia & the Pacific (excluding India).            SDPI notches 33rd position in “Best New Idea or Paradigm Developed by A Think Tank” category.                SDPI remains 42nd in “Best Quality Assurance and Integrity Policies and Procedure” category.              SDPI stands 49th in “Think Tank to Watch in 2020”.            SDPI gets 52nd position among “Best Independent Think Tanks”.                           SDPI becomes 63rd in “Best Advocacy Campaign” category.                   SDPI secures 60th position in “Best Institutional Collaboration Involving Two or More Think Tanks” category.                       SDPI obtains 64th position in “Best Use of Media (Print & Electronic)” category.               SDPI gains 66th position in “Top Environment Policy Tink Tanks” category.                SDPI achieves 76th position in “Think Tanks With Best External Relations/Public Engagement Program” category.                    SDPI notches 99th position in “Top Social Policy Think Tanks”.            SDPI wins 140th position among “Top Domestic Economic Policy Think Tanks”.               SDPI is placed among special non-ranked category of Think Tanks – “Best Policy and Institutional Response to COVID-19”.                                            Owing to COVID-19 outbreak, SDPI staff is working from home from 9am to 5pm five days a week. All our staff members are available on phone, email and/or any other digital/electronic modes of communication during our usual official hours. You can also find all our work related to COVID-19 in orange entries in our publications section below.    The Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) is pleased to announce its Twenty-third Sustainable Development Conference (SDC) from 14 – 17 December 2020 in Islamabad, Pakistan. The overarching theme of this year’s Conference is Sustainable Development in the Times of COVID-19. Read more…       FOOD SECIRITY DASHBOARD: On 4th Nov, SDPI has shared the first prototype of Food Security Dashboard with Dr Moeed Yousaf, the Special Assistant to Prime Minister on  National Security and Economic Outreach in the presence of stakeholders, including Ministry of National Food Security and Research. Provincial and district authorities attended the event in person or through zoom. The dashboard will help the government monitor and regulate the supply chain of essential food commodities.


Published Date: Jan 17, 2012


Humanitarian assistance without conflict sensitivity can cause or aggravate tensions and conflicts and may end up doing more harm than good, said experts during the launch of a research study “Applying Conflict Sensitivity in Emergency Response: Current Practices and Way Forward” jointly organised by CARE International and Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) Monday.
The study is based on field research in Haiti, Pakistan and Sri Lanka and maps the current state of conflict sensitive approaches (CSA) in emergencies. It identifies good practices, gaps and ways to integrate CSA across emergency programming cycle.
The study concludes there are clear opportunities for synergy between conflict sensitivity integration and the emergency capacity-building initiatives currently ongoing within many agencies and puts forward the idea of sector-wide ‘Minimum Standards’ that integrate CSA across the Humanitarian Program Cycle.
Dr Abid Q Suleri, Executive Director SDPI, said that we must be ready to deal with more conflicts and old ways of responding to emergencies would not deliver any more.
He highlighted the need to sensitize disaster management polices adding that good policies can reduce the devastative impacts of disasters as often policy failures lead to human suffering.
Monika Vrsanska, Programme Officer CAFOD Pakistan, highlighting various aspects of study, recommended minimum standards to ensure conflict sensitive emergency response such as inclusion of CSA in preparedness plans and training for senior and operational staff, inclusion of ‘Good Enough’ conflict analysis in emergency assessment phase, analysis of partnership strategy, orientation of new staff, use of participatory methods in managing distributions, and inclusion of conflict benchmarks in monitoring and evaluations.
Aimal Khan Khattak, Senior Advocacy Advisor CARE International, maintained that conflict sensitivity in development assistance can serve not only to decrease levels of conflict or the potential for violent conflicts, but also to increase the effectiveness of the assistance.
He said integrating conflict sensitivity into development means thinking differently about programming, and adopting a new institutional mind-set.
Naseer Memon, Chief Executive Strengthening Participatory Organisation (SPO), said recent flood disasters have removed thin layer from medley of conflicts in society. He maintained that professionals engaged in disaster response need to understand the socio-cultural and political complexity in different parts of the country.
“Issues like local employment, local procurement, manoeuvrings in relief operations and marginalisation of weaker segments in the wake of disasters have emerged as key conflicts during recent disasters,” added Memon.
He urged the disaster response organisations to be better oriented with these conflicts and incorporate these learning in future plans.
Amajd Nazeer, Policy Advocacy and Campaigning Advisor Oxfam, appreciated the launching of much needed research study. He said that distribution of food, shelter and other vital commodities for life potentially cause conflict amongst the affected and beneficiaries. He said most of the humanitarian actors learn things on ground resulting into developing less sensitivity towards conflicts prevails in our actions and attitudes.
He said no humanitarian agency employed any kind of formal conflict analysis tools while dealing with emergencies in Pakistan, a multilingual, multi-cultural, multi-religious and highly polarized society.
During question-answer session, participants stressed on risk reduction, preparedness, further focus on gender, developing Pakistan-specific conflict sensitive approaches and a separate study on FATA and Balochistan.