Asset 1

Global Go To Think Tank Index (GGTTI) 2020 launched                    111,75 Think Tanks across the world ranked in different categories.                SDPI is ranked 90th among “Top Think Tanks Worldwide (non-US)”.           SDPI stands 11th among Top Think Tanks in South & South East Asia & the Pacific (excluding India).            SDPI notches 33rd position in “Best New Idea or Paradigm Developed by A Think Tank” category.                SDPI remains 42nd in “Best Quality Assurance and Integrity Policies and Procedure” category.              SDPI stands 49th in “Think Tank to Watch in 2020”.            SDPI gets 52nd position among “Best Independent Think Tanks”.                           SDPI becomes 63rd in “Best Advocacy Campaign” category.                   SDPI secures 60th position in “Best Institutional Collaboration Involving Two or More Think Tanks” category.                       SDPI obtains 64th position in “Best Use of Media (Print & Electronic)” category.               SDPI gains 66th position in “Top Environment Policy Tink Tanks” category.                SDPI achieves 76th position in “Think Tanks With Best External Relations/Public Engagement Program” category.                    SDPI notches 99th position in “Top Social Policy Think Tanks”.            SDPI wins 140th position among “Top Domestic Economic Policy Think Tanks”.               SDPI is placed among special non-ranked category of Think Tanks – “Best Policy and Institutional Response to COVID-19”.                                            Owing to COVID-19 outbreak, SDPI staff is working from home from 9am to 5pm five days a week. All our staff members are available on phone, email and/or any other digital/electronic modes of communication during our usual official hours. You can also find all our work related to COVID-19 in orange entries in our publications section below.    The Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) is pleased to announce its Twenty-third Sustainable Development Conference (SDC) from 14 – 17 December 2020 in Islamabad, Pakistan. The overarching theme of this year’s Conference is Sustainable Development in the Times of COVID-19. Read more…       FOOD SECIRITY DASHBOARD: On 4th Nov, SDPI has shared the first prototype of Food Security Dashboard with Dr Moeed Yousaf, the Special Assistant to Prime Minister on  National Security and Economic Outreach in the presence of stakeholders, including Ministry of National Food Security and Research. Provincial and district authorities attended the event in person or through zoom. The dashboard will help the government monitor and regulate the supply chain of essential food commodities.


Published Date: Oct 24, 2013

Iran gas pipeline not in favour of Pakistan: report

The Iran-Pakistan Gas Pipeline will bring an economic disaster in the
country as the gas imported from Iran would be more expensive.
Therefore, the government should negotiate the gas rate and delink it
from oil prices.

These were the findings of a report titled ‘Rethinking Pakistan’s
Energy Equation: Iran-Pakistan Gas Pipeline’ launched by the Sustainable
Development Policy Institute (SDPI) on Wednesday.

Presenting the report, Energy Adviser SDPI Engineer Arshad H. Abbasi said gas
and oil were different commodities and Pakistan needed to re-negotiate the gas price with Iran.

"We have an agreement with Iran that we will buy gas for $15/ MMBTU.
However, Turkmenistan is supplying gas to Japan at a rate of $4/ MMBTU,"
he said.

The energy adviser said Pakistan needed $8 billion to lay the
pipeline from Nawabshah to the Iranian border which was not affordable.
Therefore, the government should give preference to the construction of
dams as hydroelectricity is the cheapest source of energy, he said.

"By paying a high price, Pakistan will generate electricity for Rs15
per unit. However, the government should not forget that Independent
Power Producers (IPPs) installed in Pakistan are not very efficient so
the cost of per unit electricity could further increase," he said.

Mr Abbasi said when the agreement was signed with Iran in 2004,
Pakistan had linked the gas rate with the price of oil. However, as oil
prices had increased in the international market, the gas imported by
Pakistan would also be more expensive.

"Italy and Germany took their cases to the International Court of
Arbitration for delinking oil and gas prices regarding their gas deal.
Pakistan can also negotiate the gas price with Iran under Clause 6.3 of
the agreement," he said.

He said that Pakistan had a combined power generation capacity of
24,000MW which it was unable to meet due to the scarcity of natural gas.

It had failed to discover new gas reserves and was forced to import the fuel to meet its growing energy requirements, he added.

Similarly, the former chairman of Water and Power Development
Authority (Wapda) and the former Chief Minister of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa,
Engr. Shamsul Mulk, said hydel power could be generated at a cost of
Rs1.75 per unit.

Furthermore, electricity generation using gas (extracted within the
country) required Rs6.5 per unit and through furnace oil, the per-unit
cost of electricity would be Rs16.5.

"Consistent policy failure in the energy sector has led to the
present high costs of electricity. We should construct more dams because
they provide water for agriculture and save the country from floods."

"Egypt managed to survive a seven-year-long drought with the help of a proper water storage system, the Aswan Dam," he said.

Former ambassador Shafqat Kakakhel said there was a dire need for
improving the transmission and distribution system in the country,
developing clean sources of energy, controlling indiscriminate spread of
gas connections and maintaining smart meters.

He said Pakistan had already witnessed a ‘capital flight’ due to the
energy crisis as several textile units had shifted to Bangladesh which
had led to massive unemployment here.

Earlier, Executive Director SDPI Dr Abid Qaiyum Suleri said the
report gained significance from the fact that Pakistan would have to
consider the international natural gas scenario and the position taken
by the United States regarding
diplomatic relations with Iran.