Asset 1

Global Go To Think Tank Index (GGTTI) 2020 launched                    111,75 Think Tanks across the world ranked in different categories.                SDPI is ranked 90th among “Top Think Tanks Worldwide (non-US)”.           SDPI stands 11th among Top Think Tanks in South & South East Asia & the Pacific (excluding India).            SDPI notches 33rd position in “Best New Idea or Paradigm Developed by A Think Tank” category.                SDPI remains 42nd in “Best Quality Assurance and Integrity Policies and Procedure” category.              SDPI stands 49th in “Think Tank to Watch in 2020”.            SDPI gets 52nd position among “Best Independent Think Tanks”.                           SDPI becomes 63rd in “Best Advocacy Campaign” category.                   SDPI secures 60th position in “Best Institutional Collaboration Involving Two or More Think Tanks” category.                       SDPI obtains 64th position in “Best Use of Media (Print & Electronic)” category.               SDPI gains 66th position in “Top Environment Policy Tink Tanks” category.                SDPI achieves 76th position in “Think Tanks With Best External Relations/Public Engagement Program” category.                    SDPI notches 99th position in “Top Social Policy Think Tanks”.            SDPI wins 140th position among “Top Domestic Economic Policy Think Tanks”.               SDPI is placed among special non-ranked category of Think Tanks – “Best Policy and Institutional Response to COVID-19”.                                            Owing to COVID-19 outbreak, SDPI staff is working from home from 9am to 5pm five days a week. All our staff members are available on phone, email and/or any other digital/electronic modes of communication during our usual official hours. You can also find all our work related to COVID-19 in orange entries in our publications section below.    The Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) is pleased to announce its Twenty-third Sustainable Development Conference (SDC) from 14 – 17 December 2020 in Islamabad, Pakistan. The overarching theme of this year’s Conference is Sustainable Development in the Times of COVID-19. Read more…       FOOD SECIRITY DASHBOARD: On 4th Nov, SDPI has shared the first prototype of Food Security Dashboard with Dr Moeed Yousaf, the Special Assistant to Prime Minister on  National Security and Economic Outreach in the presence of stakeholders, including Ministry of National Food Security and Research. Provincial and district authorities attended the event in person or through zoom. The dashboard will help the government monitor and regulate the supply chain of essential food commodities.

Business Recorder

Published Date: Dec 19, 2014

Pakistan and India must talk despite negative mood

Pradeep S Mehta is the founder and Secretary General of the Jaipur-based
Consumer Unity & Trust Society (CUTS International). He has studied
commerce at the Calcutta University and law at the Rajasthan
University, Jaipur. In April, 2012, Mehta was nominated to the High
Level Stakeholders Panel of WTO on Defining the Future of Trade. Among
other notable appointments, Mehta has been Honorary Adviser to the
Commerce & Industry Minister of India and NGO Adviser to the WTO
Director General from 2002 to 2005. He serves on several policy-making
bodies of the Government of India and Inter-Governmental Organisations
related to trade, investment, competition, and environment and consumer
affairs. He has published/edited several books and papers on trade,
investment, competition and development.

Following are selected excerpts from Mehta’s recent sit-down
with BR Research at an SDPI conference in Islamabad. We discussed
regional trade, consumer gains, and the contentious Indo-Pak relations
these days.

BR Research: Please tell us briefly about CUTS and how it has
evolved over the last three decades? Pradeep Mehta: CUTS is a leading
economic policy research, advocacy and networking, non-governmental
group in India. I founded it in 1983 in Jaipur, India, as a consumer
organisation. In the last 31 years, we have graduated to do policy
research and advocacy on issues that are directly related to enhancing
consumer welfare. I had a business, but I sold my stake to my partner in
1990, because I couldn’t do this job on a part-time basis.

Today we are an international organisation – with offices in
Nairobi, Lusaka, Accra, Hanoi and Geneva. By and large, we do a lot of
work on economic policymaking, like trade, investment, competition,
regulation and consumer protection. We are donor-dependent but we are
well-endowed in terms of finances. We have several regional partnerships
with other organisations.

BRR: What are the areas CUTS is currently working on?

PM: At CUTS, we divide our work into three verticals: Trade,
Regulation and Governance. We have several projects in trade. Now we
have a think-tank agreement with the department of agriculture, food
processing and department of animal husbandry in India to provide them
regular data analysis on tariff and non-tariff barriers facing Indian
exports. That is a big breakthrough for us and it is in sync with the
new government’s "Make in India" campaign. The government wants to cut
non-essential imports and promote domestic manufacturing and processing.
This is not to suggest that we are reverting to the olden days of
import substitution.

BRR: Intra-Saarc regional trade is very low, around 5 percent.
CUTS being at the intersection of consumer protection and trade, how do
you see this situation hurting consumers in South Asia?

PM: Yes the region’s consumers are suffering. We have conducted a
study on the cost of economic non-co-operation in South Asia and we
came up with the conclusion that Saarc countries can achieve a minimum
consumer welfare gain of $2 billion per annum by way of savings on
aggregate consumer expenditure on imported products in selected
countries. Moreover, non-tariff measures including customs procedures
and other procedural non-tariff measures account for more than 80
percent of cost of doing trade.

In the Indo-Pak context, once Pakistan gives India the currently
held up Non-Discriminatory Market Access (NDMA) or MFN status, you will
see a lot of benefits flowing to the Pakistani consumers. Inspired by
our study, which was conducted in partnership with the SDPI in Pakistan,
Dr Nadeem ul Haque, Pakistan’s former Planning Commission deputy
chairman and minister, carried out many tariff-related reforms and
turned the positive list into negative list, which straightaway had an
impact of 18.5 percent growth in Indo-Pak trade volumes. So the
Pakistani consumers have gained.

But the scope of gains for Pakistan is much higher, especially
in the automobiles and pharmaceutical sectors. And this is true for
Pakistan-made products as well. India’s consumer market – there are
about 350 million Indians who are at middle class and above level – is
as big as the United States’. India’s domestic market is its huge
advantage to foreign companies. Pakistan can also benefit from the big
market next door.

BRR: Relations between the two countries are icy right now. Do
you expect a thaw anytime soon so that the NDMA issue can be resolved?

PM: I don’t know for sure. The Kashmir issue has again surfaced,
which I honestly think is irresolvable. Unnecessary aggression is
taking place from both sides. People need to move on, for which, maybe,
the Kashmir issues needs to be put aside so that economic measures can
be discussed. Otherwise, we will be shooting ourselves in the foot.

BRR: Does Pakistan have any incentive to go back to trade talks
when putting Kashmir on the backburner (as happened during 2008-13)
hasn’t been fruitful in the past?

PM: That is a tragic conclusion, although I think you can make
progress on trade while still talking on Kashmir. But let me tell you,
and I am saying this as a realist and not because I am from India, that
India is too busy on too many fronts and is simply not interested in
picking up fights. The government in India is ready and willing to move
forward on trade, but nothing is happening on India-Pakistan front as a
whole. Recently, the Saarc leaders wanted to sign two agreements: one in
transport and the other in electricity. But Pakistan has been

But let’s keep the dialogue alive. Track-I dialogue has come to a
standstill, yes, but track-II is still going on. As we speak (the
interview took place on December 9) there is a Pakistani parliamentary
delegation in India talking to their counterparts. We need to keep
talking, and solve smaller issues like connectivity and visas. Right
now, the mood is negative, and as a result, the number of visas issued
is declining.

In the larger picture, I think Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, who
also campaigned for peaceful relations with India in last year’s
elections, needs to make a better case for peaceful relations. I like
coming to Pakistan; I get a lot of love and respect here. I would like
to have better and productive bilateral relations.

BRR: But the dominant perception in Pakistan, after recent LoC
skirmishes, is that Narendra Modi, who comes from the hard-liner RSS
background, is promoting Indian hegemony in the region. That doesn’t go
down well here. How do you respond to that?

PM: Narendra Modi is a pragmatist. When he was sworn in, he
invited all Saarc heads of state, including PM Sharif, to his swearing
in ceremony back in May. So the signals he has been giving suggest we
want a peaceful South Asia. And that’s because all regional economies
will benefit from peace. Nobody wants a full-scale war. It’s extremely
unnecessary to fight. Look at the challenges of poverty and unemployment
facing this region. Knowing what is doable and what is needed to be
done will help the political leaders avoid distraction.

Source :