Asset 1

Global Go To Think Tank Index (GGTTI) 2020 launched                    111,75 Think Tanks across the world ranked in different categories.                SDPI is ranked 90th among “Top Think Tanks Worldwide (non-US)”.           SDPI stands 11th among Top Think Tanks in South & South East Asia & the Pacific (excluding India).            SDPI notches 33rd position in “Best New Idea or Paradigm Developed by A Think Tank” category.                SDPI remains 42nd in “Best Quality Assurance and Integrity Policies and Procedure” category.              SDPI stands 49th in “Think Tank to Watch in 2020”.            SDPI gets 52nd position among “Best Independent Think Tanks”.                           SDPI becomes 63rd in “Best Advocacy Campaign” category.                   SDPI secures 60th position in “Best Institutional Collaboration Involving Two or More Think Tanks” category.                       SDPI obtains 64th position in “Best Use of Media (Print & Electronic)” category.               SDPI gains 66th position in “Top Environment Policy Tink Tanks” category.                SDPI achieves 76th position in “Think Tanks With Best External Relations/Public Engagement Program” category.                    SDPI notches 99th position in “Top Social Policy Think Tanks”.            SDPI wins 140th position among “Top Domestic Economic Policy Think Tanks”.               SDPI is placed among special non-ranked category of Think Tanks – “Best Policy and Institutional Response to COVID-19”.                                            Owing to COVID-19 outbreak, SDPI staff is working from home from 9am to 5pm five days a week. All our staff members are available on phone, email and/or any other digital/electronic modes of communication during our usual official hours. You can also find all our work related to COVID-19 in orange entries in our publications section below.    The Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) is pleased to announce its Twenty-third Sustainable Development Conference (SDC) from 14 – 17 December 2020 in Islamabad, Pakistan. The overarching theme of this year’s Conference is Sustainable Development in the Times of COVID-19. Read more…       FOOD SECIRITY DASHBOARD: On 4th Nov, SDPI has shared the first prototype of Food Security Dashboard with Dr Moeed Yousaf, the Special Assistant to Prime Minister on  National Security and Economic Outreach in the presence of stakeholders, including Ministry of National Food Security and Research. Provincial and district authorities attended the event in person or through zoom. The dashboard will help the government monitor and regulate the supply chain of essential food commodities.

The Dawn

Published Date: Jun 19, 2014

Rich growing richer at the cost of poor

Pakistan’s economy has not done badly in the last two decades
and per capita income in the country rose from $612 in 2003 to $1,295 in 2013 despite deteriorated internal security and frequent natural disasters, according to the International Monetary Fund. But participants in a discussion on inequality, arranged by SDPI and Oxfam here on Wednesday, learnt that the doubling of national income benefited
the poor of the country the least.

“In urban areas, the top 20 per cent of the population take 61 per cent of the monthly income
in comparison to 3.45 per cent of the bottom 20 per cent,” informed Babar Jamal of the Sustainable Development Policy Institute.

advanced economies are worrying about the economic costs of the rising income and wealth inequalities. They are debating the issue but little is heard about it in Pakistan where income, gender and regional inequalities exist in extreme forms.

“Elite captured political institutions shifting income and wealth from the poor to the rich through various instruments including indirect taxation and setting public spending priorities which help the rich get richer. This vicious cycle of power generating wealth and wealth bolstering power is the key structural development problem in Pakistan,” concluded SDPI experts.

Phlilips, Oxfam’s director of campaigns, recalled that his organisation’s disclosure that 85 richest people in the world have the same wealth as the 3.5 billion people forming the bottom half of the world’s population, shook even the rich who gathered at Davos this year.

the world the public is calling for action to tackle extreme inequality. Education and health for all are possible. Those with the most to spare should contribute the most in taxes,” he said, extending Oxfam’s cooperation to Pakistani activists in building “societies where everyone matters”.

Even pro-poor laws work where the civil society is active, he reminded.

movements have improved social justice and wealth distribution in Brazil and Bolivia and Sweden has become the place to live the American dream instead of the United States where the richest 10 per cent captured all the growth since the latest recession hit the sole super power, he noted.

Journalist Shahidur Rehman, whose book ‘Who owns Pakistan ‘ caused a stir in the late 1990s, asked him what help should be
expected in tracking down “the filthy rich of Pakistan” who don’t keep corporate assets in their names and stash away their ill-gotten wealth in off-shore British havens.

“It needs global action. British off-shore territories have one-third of the $18 trillion kept in such havens. G-8 and G-20 countries are tackling the problem but only to help
each other, not the poor countries,” responded the Oxfam official.

Phillips also received a sharp rebuff from his Pakistani Oxfam colleague, Mustafa Talpur, for saying that “inequality is inevitable but
not of this [current] level”.

“”Of course inequality is inherent in the capitalist system but not inevitable,” Talpur said.

have spent five years with downtrodden Hindu Kohlis in Sindh who take their misery as their destiny. Such pessimism has become national psyche
where martial law is taken to be our destiny.”

A participant made the anchorperson uneasy when he launched his woes in Urdu.

see inequality at my own level. My vote is sought for national level politics when my and my community’s problems are local. We can think of higher levels after we have control over local affairs,” he said, hinting at the near consensus among the ruling national political parties not to allow meaningful local governments.