Asset 1

Global Go To Think Tank Index (GGTTI) 2020 launched                    111,75 Think Tanks across the world ranked in different categories.                SDPI is ranked 90th among “Top Think Tanks Worldwide (non-US)”.           SDPI stands 11th among Top Think Tanks in South & South East Asia & the Pacific (excluding India).            SDPI notches 33rd position in “Best New Idea or Paradigm Developed by A Think Tank” category.                SDPI remains 42nd in “Best Quality Assurance and Integrity Policies and Procedure” category.              SDPI stands 49th in “Think Tank to Watch in 2020”.            SDPI gets 52nd position among “Best Independent Think Tanks”.                           SDPI becomes 63rd in “Best Advocacy Campaign” category.                   SDPI secures 60th position in “Best Institutional Collaboration Involving Two or More Think Tanks” category.                       SDPI obtains 64th position in “Best Use of Media (Print & Electronic)” category.               SDPI gains 66th position in “Top Environment Policy Tink Tanks” category.                SDPI achieves 76th position in “Think Tanks With Best External Relations/Public Engagement Program” category.                    SDPI notches 99th position in “Top Social Policy Think Tanks”.            SDPI wins 140th position among “Top Domestic Economic Policy Think Tanks”.               SDPI is placed among special non-ranked category of Think Tanks – “Best Policy and Institutional Response to COVID-19”.                                            Owing to COVID-19 outbreak, SDPI staff is working from home from 9am to 5pm five days a week. All our staff members are available on phone, email and/or any other digital/electronic modes of communication during our usual official hours. You can also find all our work related to COVID-19 in orange entries in our publications section below.    The Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) is pleased to announce its Twenty-third Sustainable Development Conference (SDC) from 14 – 17 December 2020 in Islamabad, Pakistan. The overarching theme of this year’s Conference is Sustainable Development in the Times of COVID-19. Read more…       FOOD SECIRITY DASHBOARD: On 4th Nov, SDPI has shared the first prototype of Food Security Dashboard with Dr Moeed Yousaf, the Special Assistant to Prime Minister on  National Security and Economic Outreach in the presence of stakeholders, including Ministry of National Food Security and Research. Provincial and district authorities attended the event in person or through zoom. The dashboard will help the government monitor and regulate the supply chain of essential food commodities.

Dawn, News one

Published Date: Aug 18, 2012


With its one of the highest system losses in Pakistan and continued injection of huge subsidies, the objective of privatisation of the Karachi Electric Supply Company (KESC) has failed, according to a latest research by a private think tank.

Arshad H. Abbasi, adviser at Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI), the author of the research, said the only way to resolve the energy crisis was to invest and buy affordable electricity from hydropower, improve fuel efficiency of power plants and introduce ‘smart grid’ with advanced metering system.

The report ‘Pakistan Power Outlook: Appraisal of KESC after Privatisation’ underpins the causes of the energy situation in Pakistan while taking KESC as a case study.

It said KESC had been granted huge subsidies which defeats the purpose of privatising the utility, which is to reduce the fiscal burden of the government of Pakistan.

The report illustrates that thermal power plants in Pakistan, particularly of KESC, operate at extremely low efficiency and consume very high quantity of fuel to generate per unit of electricity.

“The KESC takes 11 to 18 cubic feet of gas to generate one KWh of electricity whereas plants of other companies such as Uch Power, Saif power and Orient Power take only 7.37, 7.47 and 7.56 cubic feet of gas respectively for generating one unit”, it said that these plants had been denied gas supplies while KESC’s gas consumption per unit was almost double that of Bangladesh.

The report said that dams such as Bunji, Dasu, Lower Spat, Kohala and Tarbela fourth extension were capable of adding 15,631 MW into the system, for which feasibility studies are ready but their development was stalled or slowed down due to lack of funds and inefficiencies within the departments.

The report called on KESC and concerned authorities to invest and buy electricity from these hydro power plants at minimal cost instead of purchasing it from IPPs at very high costs.

Currently KESC is purchasing electricity at Rs8 to Rs16 per unit which is very high compared with paisa 37 per unit from hydropower plants.

“Increased dependency on fossil fuel is the fundamental cause of present energy crisis,” he said.

The study noted that thermal plants were the backbone of Pakistan’s current electricity system with capacity of generating almost 70 per cent electricity through furnace oil and gas.

“The efficiency of the thermal power plant is abnormally low, consuming high quantity of fuel to generate per unit of electricity”, he said adding that enhancing fuel efficiency would not only help to generate more electricity from the available fuel, but also help to reduce prices of electricity by bringing down the cost of generation.

Likewise, line losses, technical and transmission, are one of the highest in Pakistan. Owing to these losses, the legal consumers are not only facing electricity shortage but also have to pay for these losses.

To solve this chronic issue, the report recommends application of ‘smart grid’ option, for all electricity distribution companies of Pakistan.

This may include construction of shielded networks for electricity supply and application of remote metering at each customer connection and also at the transformer point.

“KESC can refer to the experience of Lahore Electric Supply Company (LESCO), which successfully implemented smart meters in the old walled city of Lahore and brought down line losses from 17.8 per cent to 3.5 per cent within 10 months,” the report adds.

While criticizing the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority, the report said that in all successful privatizations, the regulator played a vital role in post privatization period. But in the case of KESC, which was privatised in 2005, the regulatory role of NEPRA and non-existence monitoring mechanism at ministry of water and power became one of the main causes behind the prevailing energy crisis.

It said the role of NEPRA has been curtailed only to tariff determination and called upon it broaden its role from tariff determination to formulating standards, regulating energy sector and giving incentives for improving fuel efficiency.