Asset 1

Global Go To Think Tank Index (GGTTI) 2020 launched                    111,75 Think Tanks across the world ranked in different categories.                SDPI is ranked 90th among “Top Think Tanks Worldwide (non-US)”.           SDPI stands 11th among Top Think Tanks in South & South East Asia & the Pacific (excluding India).            SDPI notches 33rd position in “Best New Idea or Paradigm Developed by A Think Tank” category.                SDPI remains 42nd in “Best Quality Assurance and Integrity Policies and Procedure” category.              SDPI stands 49th in “Think Tank to Watch in 2020”.            SDPI gets 52nd position among “Best Independent Think Tanks”.                           SDPI becomes 63rd in “Best Advocacy Campaign” category.                   SDPI secures 60th position in “Best Institutional Collaboration Involving Two or More Think Tanks” category.                       SDPI obtains 64th position in “Best Use of Media (Print & Electronic)” category.               SDPI gains 66th position in “Top Environment Policy Tink Tanks” category.                SDPI achieves 76th position in “Think Tanks With Best External Relations/Public Engagement Program” category.                    SDPI notches 99th position in “Top Social Policy Think Tanks”.            SDPI wins 140th position among “Top Domestic Economic Policy Think Tanks”.               SDPI is placed among special non-ranked category of Think Tanks – “Best Policy and Institutional Response to COVID-19”.                                            Owing to COVID-19 outbreak, SDPI staff is working from home from 9am to 5pm five days a week. All our staff members are available on phone, email and/or any other digital/electronic modes of communication during our usual official hours. You can also find all our work related to COVID-19 in orange entries in our publications section below.    The Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) is pleased to announce its Twenty-third Sustainable Development Conference (SDC) from 14 – 17 December 2020 in Islamabad, Pakistan. The overarching theme of this year’s Conference is Sustainable Development in the Times of COVID-19. Read more…       FOOD SECIRITY DASHBOARD: On 4th Nov, SDPI has shared the first prototype of Food Security Dashboard with Dr Moeed Yousaf, the Special Assistant to Prime Minister on  National Security and Economic Outreach in the presence of stakeholders, including Ministry of National Food Security and Research. Provincial and district authorities attended the event in person or through zoom. The dashboard will help the government monitor and regulate the supply chain of essential food commodities.

The Dawn

Published Date: Mar 5, 2014

Think tanks and thought buckets

Once they were rare and elitist. Now they are ubiquitous and
accepting. Still, affiliation with a reputed think tank is a coveted prize for
intellectuals and thought leaders. While thousands of think tanks are busy
prescribing solutions for global challenges, disease, poverty, and war continue
to consume hundreds of millions across the globe. One would rather have ‘do
tanks’ comprising doers, and not just thinkers, to bring change that eludes us.

By one count there are over 6,800 think tanks in the world.
The Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program at the University of Pennsylvania
maintains a global database of think tanks and generates annual rankings of
think tanks based on a survey of industry leaders. The 2013 Global Go To Think
Index Report was released in January 2014 that ranked Alternate Solutions
Institute promoting free market thinking as Pakistan’s most influential think

The rapid growth of think tanks since the early 60s suggests
a global demand for idea generating institutions. Think tanks have emerged on
almost all matters of public interest. Some think tanks are primarily academic
in nature and focus on generating scholarly publications. Others are more
partisan outfits that are dedicated to serving their benefactors by influencing
public policy or public opinion. Such influence peddling by certain very
influential think tanks has met with public’s cynicism.

The Think Tank program at the University of Pennsylvania is
rather unique. Each year it surveys a distinguished panel of almost 1,900
experts from think tanks, universities and media to rank think tanks in a
variety of categories. In the first round, the 6,800 think tanks and thousands
of journalists and development professionals are asked to nominate think tanks
for rankings. Those institutions with five or more nominations are shortlisted
for being ranked by the expert panel of 1,950 individuals and institutions.

North America continues to lead in the number of think tanks
followed by Europe. Individually, the United States with 1,828 think tanks is
far ahead of others in the number of nationally registered think tanks. With
almost 400 think tanks, Washington, DC is the global hub of think tanks. China
with 426 think tanks is a distant second followed by the United Kingdom with
287 think tanks. India with 268 think tanks is fourth on the list. The rankings
recognised 19 think tanks from Pakistan. The Planning Commission, government’s
premier thought generating body, didn’t make the cut.

The Washington, DC based Brookings Institution was
recognised as the think tank of the year for 2013. Brookings is indeed an
intellectual powerhouse that generates influential research on matters ranging
from foreign policy to urbanization. Over 300 leading experts affiliated with
Brookings generate research and ideas on public policy issues. The commentary
and opinions are normative in nature and offer prescriptions. For instance, a recent
blog post by Professor Madiha Afzal on Brooking’s website urges Prime Minister
Nawaz Sharif to share his vision for the country with the masses while the
peace talks with the Taliban continue. According to Professor Afzal, Mr. Sharif
must talk to the people “to “win the war of words and ideas with the Taliban,
and, along with it, the hearts and minds of Pakistani citizens.”

Outside of the United States, Chatham House in United
Kingdom received the highest ranking for 2013. Stockholm International Peace
Research Institute (SIPRI) in Sweden was ranked third. I have followed SIPRI’s
work since early 90s. It was during a chance encounter with the renowned Indian
journalist Parful Bidwai, whom I interviewed for The Frontier Post, that I
learnt of SIPRI. I found Mr. Bidwai very knowledgeable of nuclear armament and
asked him about the source of his information. SIPRI, he replied. Later in
1993, I had to travel to Lahore to consult SIPRI’s annual report at
Quaid-e-Azam library. I couldn’t locate a copy in Islamabad.

The report ranks Alternate Solutions Institute as Pakistan’s
top, and Central Asia’s third most influential, think tank. I am a bit
surprised about this finding. Over the years, I have seen Sustainable
Development Policy Institute to be the more influential think tank in Pakistan.
I remember the days when Tariq Banuri used to run the enterprising Institute
and as young journalists in the early 90s we were in awe of the place. Dr.
Banuri portrayed intellectual elitism that we all despised, but still couldn’t
resist SDPI’s lure. The Institute’s current office and programming is rather
modest compared to its ‘glorious’ past. It could very well be true that other
institutes have become more prominent over time. Alternate Solutions Institute
though lists a book launch from 2012 under current events. This is
uncharacteristic of an influential think tank whose most recent event is more
than a year old!

Pakistan needs to deploy more brain power to find solutions
for current challenges. A complete breakdown in law and order, sectarian and
communal violence, high fertility and poverty, preventable diseases,
illiteracy, and a struggling economy are some of the challenges faced by the
nation. Think tanks can help devise solutions. There is, however, one big
problem. A large number of think tanks in Pakistan are funded by well-meaning
foreign sponsors.

Pakistani philanthropists have to change this practice. If
we want indigenous solutions for our problems, we would have to invest in them.
Charity of foreign taxpayers can accomplish only so much.