Asset 1

Global Go To Think Tank Index (GGTTI) 2020 launched                    111,75 Think Tanks across the world ranked in different categories.                SDPI is ranked 90th among “Top Think Tanks Worldwide (non-US)”.           SDPI stands 11th among Top Think Tanks in South & South East Asia & the Pacific (excluding India).            SDPI notches 33rd position in “Best New Idea or Paradigm Developed by A Think Tank” category.                SDPI remains 42nd in “Best Quality Assurance and Integrity Policies and Procedure” category.              SDPI stands 49th in “Think Tank to Watch in 2020”.            SDPI gets 52nd position among “Best Independent Think Tanks”.                           SDPI becomes 63rd in “Best Advocacy Campaign” category.                   SDPI secures 60th position in “Best Institutional Collaboration Involving Two or More Think Tanks” category.                       SDPI obtains 64th position in “Best Use of Media (Print & Electronic)” category.               SDPI gains 66th position in “Top Environment Policy Tink Tanks” category.                SDPI achieves 76th position in “Think Tanks With Best External Relations/Public Engagement Program” category.                    SDPI notches 99th position in “Top Social Policy Think Tanks”.            SDPI wins 140th position among “Top Domestic Economic Policy Think Tanks”.               SDPI is placed among special non-ranked category of Think Tanks – “Best Policy and Institutional Response to COVID-19”.                                            Owing to COVID-19 outbreak, SDPI staff is working from home from 9am to 5pm five days a week. All our staff members are available on phone, email and/or any other digital/electronic modes of communication during our usual official hours. You can also find all our work related to COVID-19 in orange entries in our publications section below.    The Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) is pleased to announce its Twenty-third Sustainable Development Conference (SDC) from 14 – 17 December 2020 in Islamabad, Pakistan. The overarching theme of this year’s Conference is Sustainable Development in the Times of COVID-19. Read more…       FOOD SECIRITY DASHBOARD: On 4th Nov, SDPI has shared the first prototype of Food Security Dashboard with Dr Moeed Yousaf, the Special Assistant to Prime Minister on  National Security and Economic Outreach in the presence of stakeholders, including Ministry of National Food Security and Research. Provincial and district authorities attended the event in person or through zoom. The dashboard will help the government monitor and regulate the supply chain of essential food commodities.

Poor performance
By: Altaf Hussain
The government needs to change the social protection paradigm to end poverty To begin with, it is high time for Pakistan’s social protection paradigm to move beyond ‘risk management’ to a holistic approach addressing the issue of poverty instead of focusing on narrow conceptualisation of safety nets and risk management. If Pakistan needs to significantly dent poverty and achieve the target of UN’s first Sustainable Development Goal of Eradicating Poverty in all its forms by 2030, it needs to create a balance between social support and labour market opportunities for the poor.

Social protection has received significant attention as a major instrument to address ‘poverty’ and ‘vulnerability’. Subsequently, cash transfers emerged as a silver bullet to support the poor and destitute living below the poverty line. Pakistan also resorted to this approach and has made considerable economic contribution in the lives of poor through Benazir Income Support Programme (BISP), let alone Pakistan Bait-ul-Mal, Zakat and other initiatives. However, still a large chunk of the populace lives in abject poverty putting question marks on the utility and sustainability of direct cash support to the poor.

Some of the major social protection and social safety net programmes in Pakistan are non-contributory cash supports; Benazir Income Support Program (BISP), Pakistan Bait-ul-Mal (PBM), Zakat, while, others are contributory including Employees Old Age Benefit Institution (EOBI) and Workers Welfare Fund (WWF). But they have had little impact to reduce poverty drastically because they do not ensure any labour market incentive to the poor, which can help them sustain their incomes and livelihoods independently of income support.

Cash transfer programmes, by and large, emanate from the ‘income risk’ reduction concepts. These ‘income risk’ based policies have taken narrow conceptualisation of poverty, limiting it to the income risk only and ignoring multi-dimensionality of poverty and wellbeing. Little effort has been made to link them with the rights of citizens and inclusive development including creating job market opportunities for the poor.

According to Pakistan Economic Survey 2015-16, “29.5 per cent of the population lives below poverty line. The population estimate of 186.2 million for 2013-14 implies that around 55 million people are living below the poverty line in Pakistan”. Of those, 18.2 per cent live in urban areas and 35.6 per cent in rural areas.
To achieve the goal of poverty eradication in all its form, Pakistan needs to create a balance between social cash transfers and employment, because both are interlinked in many important ways.

Whereas, some independent organisations have put the number of people living in poverty higher than those claimed by the government of Pakistan, according to a report of Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) titled ‘Clustered Deprivation’, 58.7 million people live in multidimensional poverty.
Likewise, Pakistan has a huge gap in the income inequalities vis-à-vis its poor and rich segments of society. According to some estimates, the income inequality widened the gap between the rich and poor. Between the periods between 1987-88 and 2004-05, it increased by 17 per cent.

Nonetheless, achieving first SDG goal of eradicating poverty in all its forms by 2030 seems a distant reality. This worldview is strengthened due to experience Pakistan had with Millennium Development Goals. Pakistan could not deliver completely to the commitments of Millennium Development Goals (MDGs); many of the goals were not achieved or were way behind the target. And now the bar has been set high for SDGs, thus, policy makers need to formulate a strategy which helps achieve the goal of eradicating poverty in all its forms from Pakistan by 2030.

Social protection can be effective in achieving the results of denting the poverty down when there exists a robust labour market. The labour market outcomes for the families and especially for breadwinners are insignificant and un-satisfactory. Just giving money to the poor may not be sufficient for long-standing and intergenerational poverty but labour market opportunities will pull them out of it. Social protection policies may well be combined with the strategy to create and offer poor children and their adults with entrepreneurship and job opportunities.

To achieve the goal of poverty eradication in all its form, Pakistan needs to create a balance between social cash transfers and employment, because both are interlinked in many important ways. “For many households decent employment is the most appropriate route out of poverty and the most effective mechanism of social protection”, says Aly Ercelan, development economist.

It is a duty of the government and relevant institutions to create appropriate labour market opportunities for the poor. This is an opportunity for the donors and the government in Islamabad to focus on the provincial social protection policies after the 18th amendment. In post-18th amendment era, the provinces have got greater role and responsibility to address the issues of people.

This article was originally published at:

The opinions expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint or stance of SDPI.