Asset 1

Global Go To Think Tank Index (GGTTI) 2020 launched                    111,75 Think Tanks across the world ranked in different categories.                SDPI is ranked 90th among “Top Think Tanks Worldwide (non-US)”.           SDPI stands 11th among Top Think Tanks in South & South East Asia & the Pacific (excluding India).            SDPI notches 33rd position in “Best New Idea or Paradigm Developed by A Think Tank” category.                SDPI remains 42nd in “Best Quality Assurance and Integrity Policies and Procedure” category.              SDPI stands 49th in “Think Tank to Watch in 2020”.            SDPI gets 52nd position among “Best Independent Think Tanks”.                           SDPI becomes 63rd in “Best Advocacy Campaign” category.                   SDPI secures 60th position in “Best Institutional Collaboration Involving Two or More Think Tanks” category.                       SDPI obtains 64th position in “Best Use of Media (Print & Electronic)” category.               SDPI gains 66th position in “Top Environment Policy Tink Tanks” category.                SDPI achieves 76th position in “Think Tanks With Best External Relations/Public Engagement Program” category.                    SDPI notches 99th position in “Top Social Policy Think Tanks”.            SDPI wins 140th position among “Top Domestic Economic Policy Think Tanks”.               SDPI is placed among special non-ranked category of Think Tanks – “Best Policy and Institutional Response to COVID-19”.                                            Owing to COVID-19 outbreak, SDPI staff is working from home from 9am to 5pm five days a week. All our staff members are available on phone, email and/or any other digital/electronic modes of communication during our usual official hours. You can also find all our work related to COVID-19 in orange entries in our publications section below.    The Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) is pleased to announce its Twenty-third Sustainable Development Conference (SDC) from 14 – 17 December 2020 in Islamabad, Pakistan. The overarching theme of this year’s Conference is Sustainable Development in the Times of COVID-19. Read more…       FOOD SECIRITY DASHBOARD: On 4th Nov, SDPI has shared the first prototype of Food Security Dashboard with Dr Moeed Yousaf, the Special Assistant to Prime Minister on  National Security and Economic Outreach in the presence of stakeholders, including Ministry of National Food Security and Research. Provincial and district authorities attended the event in person or through zoom. The dashboard will help the government monitor and regulate the supply chain of essential food commodities.

Dimensions and Barriers to Financial Risk: The Case of CPEC
By: SDPI

Program/Project Brief:

This is a small three months project that we win from Centre of Excellence-CPEC (CoE-CPEC), under the Competitive Policy Research Grant-2017 (Phase 1). This research comes under the sub-theme of Financing and Financial Sector Integration under CPEC of policy research on CPEC. The basic aim of the research is to build literature in the neglected dimension of risk assessment of CPEC.
Specifically this brief paper will indemnify the multidimensional financial risk, possible solutions/strategies to divert/adjust each dimension of risk, relative importance of risk classifications and to assess the barriers in the way of implementation of risk. To protect this billion dollar investment from risk, the risk assessment approach must reflect a true understanding of these issues and address a number of unique challenges.

Donors/Partners: Centre of Excellence (CoE) CPEC

Locale: Pakistan

Duration of Project: 3 Months

Concept/Introduction:

Increasing cost, poor performance and delays of time are often associated with construction project (Thompson, & Perry, 1992) rather than other industry having least exposure to risk (Carr, & Tah, 2001). An unsure event suppose happened, adversely affect the project objectives including but not limited to cost, time and quality (PMI, 2008). Decision making for better results (project outcome) regarding recognizing different dimensions of financial risk, different risk group along with barrier of implementation of risk management in construction projects are very fruitful. As opposed to financial industries where the risk can easily be recognized (Laryea, 2008; Taroun, 2014), but because of its complex and dynamic nature (Hwang, & Toh, 2014) various types of risk are associated with construction project and therefore difficult to identify. Although complete elimination of risks in construction projects is difficult to made possible, but identified risks can easily be managed effectively (Zou, & Wang, 2007; Smith, & Bohn, 1999).

Objectives:

  • To identify the major dimensions of inquiry of Financial Risk Assessment associated with CPEC
  • To identify Relative Importance of Risk Classification and its mitigation measures
  • To identify barrier(s) in implementation of risk management/assessment

Status: Ongoing

Work/activities accomplished:

  1. Background write up is complete
  2. Online Survey has been developed comprises of
  • Responded profile
  • Relative Importance of Risk Classification and its mitigations measures
  • Reasons of project delay and cost overrun and its mitigation measures
  • Barrier(s) in implementation of risk management/assessment and the risk tolerance of the investors

Team Members:

Dr. Sajid Amin Javed and Wajid Ali