Asset 1

Global Go To Think Tank Index (GGTTI) 2020 launched                    111,75 Think Tanks across the world ranked in different categories.                SDPI is ranked 90th among “Top Think Tanks Worldwide (non-US)”.           SDPI stands 11th among Top Think Tanks in South & South East Asia & the Pacific (excluding India).            SDPI notches 33rd position in “Best New Idea or Paradigm Developed by A Think Tank” category.                SDPI remains 42nd in “Best Quality Assurance and Integrity Policies and Procedure” category.              SDPI stands 49th in “Think Tank to Watch in 2020”.            SDPI gets 52nd position among “Best Independent Think Tanks”.                           SDPI becomes 63rd in “Best Advocacy Campaign” category.                   SDPI secures 60th position in “Best Institutional Collaboration Involving Two or More Think Tanks” category.                       SDPI obtains 64th position in “Best Use of Media (Print & Electronic)” category.               SDPI gains 66th position in “Top Environment Policy Tink Tanks” category.                SDPI achieves 76th position in “Think Tanks With Best External Relations/Public Engagement Program” category.                    SDPI notches 99th position in “Top Social Policy Think Tanks”.            SDPI wins 140th position among “Top Domestic Economic Policy Think Tanks”.               SDPI is placed among special non-ranked category of Think Tanks – “Best Policy and Institutional Response to COVID-19”.                                            Owing to COVID-19 outbreak, SDPI staff is working from home from 9am to 5pm five days a week. All our staff members are available on phone, email and/or any other digital/electronic modes of communication during our usual official hours. You can also find all our work related to COVID-19 in orange entries in our publications section below.    The Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) is pleased to announce its Twenty-third Sustainable Development Conference (SDC) from 14 – 17 December 2020 in Islamabad, Pakistan. The overarching theme of this year’s Conference is Sustainable Development in the Times of COVID-19. Read more…       FOOD SECIRITY DASHBOARD: On 4th Nov, SDPI has shared the first prototype of Food Security Dashboard with Dr Moeed Yousaf, the Special Assistant to Prime Minister on  National Security and Economic Outreach in the presence of stakeholders, including Ministry of National Food Security and Research. Provincial and district authorities attended the event in person or through zoom. The dashboard will help the government monitor and regulate the supply chain of essential food commodities.

Impact Evaluation Study of Early Childhood Development Programme (ECDP) in Baluchistan
By: SDPI
Donor: Aga Khan Foundation (AKF), Pakistan
Duration: May 2015 to July 2015
Locale: Quetta, Qilla Saifullah and Gawader
Team Members:  Dr. Shehryar Khan, Rabia Manzoor, Muhammad Sohaib,Babur Jamal, Huma Dad Khan, Maryam Waqar, Syed Mohsin Ali Kazmi
Background and objective:
This study aims to assess the impact of early childhood services of Aga Khan Foundation (AKF) in Pakistan. The AKF, with the support from Australian Government, launched a three-year “Early Childhood Development Programme (ECDP)” in 2010 that later received a no-cost extension of two years. The programme was implemented in the most neglected and closed ethnic province of Balochistan with a motto “Ensuring the Best Start in Life for Children”. The hypothesis behind the introduction of ECD programme in three districts of Balochistan (Qilla Saifullah, Quetta and Gawadar) was to address barriers to early childhood opportunities such as access, gender equity, participation of local communities and insufficient early learning opportunities, which impact the physical, mental and emotional development of underprivileged children from 4-8 years of age. The programme consisted of two phases. The first one entailed an “inception” of ECDP in the select districts, as conceived by the implementing partners3 in accordance with prevailing social norms, culture, and in line with the provision of primary education services by the district education authorities. The second phase encompassed the “implementation” of ECD services in target districts in both the urban and rural government primary schools.
This impact evaluation particularly focuses on the “implementation” phase therefore, it broadly addresses the following questions:
a. Has the programme achieved its stated objectives?
b. Has the programme demonstrated sufficient evidence of impact viewed in terms of the services received by different stakeholders?
c. What are the gaps and observations in the delivery of ECD services?