Asset 1

Global Go To Think Tank Index (GGTTI) 2020 launched                    111,75 Think Tanks across the world ranked in different categories.                SDPI is ranked 90th among “Top Think Tanks Worldwide (non-US)”.           SDPI stands 11th among Top Think Tanks in South & South East Asia & the Pacific (excluding India).            SDPI notches 33rd position in “Best New Idea or Paradigm Developed by A Think Tank” category.                SDPI remains 42nd in “Best Quality Assurance and Integrity Policies and Procedure” category.              SDPI stands 49th in “Think Tank to Watch in 2020”.            SDPI gets 52nd position among “Best Independent Think Tanks”.                           SDPI becomes 63rd in “Best Advocacy Campaign” category.                   SDPI secures 60th position in “Best Institutional Collaboration Involving Two or More Think Tanks” category.                       SDPI obtains 64th position in “Best Use of Media (Print & Electronic)” category.               SDPI gains 66th position in “Top Environment Policy Tink Tanks” category.                SDPI achieves 76th position in “Think Tanks With Best External Relations/Public Engagement Program” category.                    SDPI notches 99th position in “Top Social Policy Think Tanks”.            SDPI wins 140th position among “Top Domestic Economic Policy Think Tanks”.               SDPI is placed among special non-ranked category of Think Tanks – “Best Policy and Institutional Response to COVID-19”.                                            Owing to COVID-19 outbreak, SDPI staff is working from home from 9am to 5pm five days a week. All our staff members are available on phone, email and/or any other digital/electronic modes of communication during our usual official hours. You can also find all our work related to COVID-19 in orange entries in our publications section below.    The Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) is pleased to announce its Twenty-third Sustainable Development Conference (SDC) from 14 – 17 December 2020 in Islamabad, Pakistan. The overarching theme of this year’s Conference is Sustainable Development in the Times of COVID-19. Read more…       FOOD SECIRITY DASHBOARD: On 4th Nov, SDPI has shared the first prototype of Food Security Dashboard with Dr Moeed Yousaf, the Special Assistant to Prime Minister on  National Security and Economic Outreach in the presence of stakeholders, including Ministry of National Food Security and Research. Provincial and district authorities attended the event in person or through zoom. The dashboard will help the government monitor and regulate the supply chain of essential food commodities.

Lack of Primary School Education (LAPSE)
By: SDPI

Partner: HDF

Year: 2010

Locale: Islamabad, Rahim Yark Khan, Lahore, Tando Muhammad Khan, Karachi, Mardan, Zhobe and Muzaffarabad.

Team members: Gulbaz Ali Khan

Introduction:

The high rate of school drop-outs from school has become an increasing concern in Pakistan during the last few years. As such, only a few studies have been conducted to understand the nature and causes of dropout rates and the reason that children were never enrolled. The Human Development Foundation (HDF) conducted a national level survey for collection of background data in three geographical regions; federal capital, provincial capitals & districts and Azad Jammu & Kashmir. For a meaningful comparison a pool of HDF, government and private funded schools were selected. The selection of schools was made on the basis of a strong presence of HDF interventions in these regions. The scope of the survey was extended to eight regions, Islamabad, Rahim Yark Khan, Lahore, Tando Muhammad Khan, Karachi, Mardan, Zhobe and Muzaffarabad.

This study provided an overview of the major underlying causes of high school dropout.  It differs from other studies, in its nature and extent as it has not only addressed causes of school drop outs across public, private and NGO funded schools but also the factors behind out of school or never enrolled children. Specific attention was given to four areas of concern, factors related to the child him/herself, the family, the school and society as a whole. Each of these factors was discussed in the light of quantitative as well as qualitative aspects.

Methodology:
The methodology adopted for this study was based on Desk Reviews, Focus Group Discussions and Key Informant Interviews and Case studies. The locus of the study was not confined to larger cities or urban regions rather baseline information was gathered from the rural households by utilizing available secondary resources.

For More Information, Contact the Following Person:


Imran Saqib Khalid , Ahmed Awais Khaver