Asset 1

Global Go To Think Tank Index (GGTTI) 2020 launched                    111,75 Think Tanks across the world ranked in different categories.                SDPI is ranked 90th among “Top Think Tanks Worldwide (non-US)”.           SDPI stands 11th among Top Think Tanks in South & South East Asia & the Pacific (excluding India).            SDPI notches 33rd position in “Best New Idea or Paradigm Developed by A Think Tank” category.                SDPI remains 42nd in “Best Quality Assurance and Integrity Policies and Procedure” category.              SDPI stands 49th in “Think Tank to Watch in 2020”.            SDPI gets 52nd position among “Best Independent Think Tanks”.                           SDPI becomes 63rd in “Best Advocacy Campaign” category.                   SDPI secures 60th position in “Best Institutional Collaboration Involving Two or More Think Tanks” category.                       SDPI obtains 64th position in “Best Use of Media (Print & Electronic)” category.               SDPI gains 66th position in “Top Environment Policy Tink Tanks” category.                SDPI achieves 76th position in “Think Tanks With Best External Relations/Public Engagement Program” category.                    SDPI notches 99th position in “Top Social Policy Think Tanks”.            SDPI wins 140th position among “Top Domestic Economic Policy Think Tanks”.               SDPI is placed among special non-ranked category of Think Tanks – “Best Policy and Institutional Response to COVID-19”.                                            Owing to COVID-19 outbreak, SDPI staff is working from home from 9am to 5pm five days a week. All our staff members are available on phone, email and/or any other digital/electronic modes of communication during our usual official hours. You can also find all our work related to COVID-19 in orange entries in our publications section below.    The Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) is pleased to announce its Twenty-third Sustainable Development Conference (SDC) from 14 – 17 December 2020 in Islamabad, Pakistan. The overarching theme of this year’s Conference is Sustainable Development in the Times of COVID-19. Read more…       FOOD SECIRITY DASHBOARD: On 4th Nov, SDPI has shared the first prototype of Food Security Dashboard with Dr Moeed Yousaf, the Special Assistant to Prime Minister on  National Security and Economic Outreach in the presence of stakeholders, including Ministry of National Food Security and Research. Provincial and district authorities attended the event in person or through zoom. The dashboard will help the government monitor and regulate the supply chain of essential food commodities.

Poverty and social Impact Analysis (PSIA) of Chief Minister Initiative of Primary Health Care in District Lodhran
By: SDPI

Partner: UNDP

Duration: October 2012 to March 2013

Locale: Lodhran

Introduction:

Poverty and Social Impact Analysis (PSIA) involves the analysis of the distributional impact of policy reforms on the well-being of different stakeholder groups with a particular focus on the poor and vulnerable. PSIAs are analytical exercises that attempt to understand the likely poverty and social impact of particular policy choices. The project has a strong focus on research studies, impact evaluations and assessments to undertake a PSIA of “Chief Minister’s Initiative of Primary Health Care (CMIPHC)” being run by Punjab Rural Support Programme (PRSP). The initiative was taken for the welfare of the poor. PSIA provided a better understanding of impact assessment of CMIPHC.

Objectivies:

  • To help take informed policy decisions through measuring the social and poverty impact of CMIPHC in Lodhran district.
  • To analyze the poverty and social nexus in the context of health care services to different segments of the society.

Findings:

  • The overall analysis depicts good social and health outcomes when compared with the baseline before the start of CMIPHC in Lodhran. The Basic Health Unit (BHU) operations were almost transparent, and Punjab Rural Support Programme (PRSP) system of monitoring was in place to ensure staff attendance and provision of services. As far as the medicine purchase is concerned, PRSP has a centralized system and Community Support Groups (CSGs) have no role either in purchase or distribution of medicines. No major flaw observed, which could be big threat to Public Private Partnership (PPP) model as well as an overall progress towards Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). The current assessment shows that there are more underlying gaps that need to be addressed for the creation and existence of effective organizational mechanisms to redresser grievances.

Recommendation:

  • The Community Support Groups (CSGs) can be instrumental for social inclusion, social influences of programme, grievance redressing mechanism, monitoring progress and programme’s sustainability. The CSGs need a proper institutional setup and active role in Basic Health Unit (BHU) affairs. The government policies support PPP model, therefore,  continuity of programme with certain improvements would bring further visible outcomes towards MDGs.

For More Information, Contact the Following Person:


Vaqar Ahmed , Muhammad Tahir Ali