Asset 1

Global Go To Think Tank Index (GGTTI) 2020 launched                    111,75 Think Tanks across the world ranked in different categories.                SDPI is ranked 90th among “Top Think Tanks Worldwide (non-US)”.           SDPI stands 11th among Top Think Tanks in South & South East Asia & the Pacific (excluding India).            SDPI notches 33rd position in “Best New Idea or Paradigm Developed by A Think Tank” category.                SDPI remains 42nd in “Best Quality Assurance and Integrity Policies and Procedure” category.              SDPI stands 49th in “Think Tank to Watch in 2020”.            SDPI gets 52nd position among “Best Independent Think Tanks”.                           SDPI becomes 63rd in “Best Advocacy Campaign” category.                   SDPI secures 60th position in “Best Institutional Collaboration Involving Two or More Think Tanks” category.                       SDPI obtains 64th position in “Best Use of Media (Print & Electronic)” category.               SDPI gains 66th position in “Top Environment Policy Tink Tanks” category.                SDPI achieves 76th position in “Think Tanks With Best External Relations/Public Engagement Program” category.                    SDPI notches 99th position in “Top Social Policy Think Tanks”.            SDPI wins 140th position among “Top Domestic Economic Policy Think Tanks”.               SDPI is placed among special non-ranked category of Think Tanks – “Best Policy and Institutional Response to COVID-19”.                                            Owing to COVID-19 outbreak, SDPI staff is working from home from 9am to 5pm five days a week. All our staff members are available on phone, email and/or any other digital/electronic modes of communication during our usual official hours. You can also find all our work related to COVID-19 in orange entries in our publications section below.    The Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) is pleased to announce its Twenty-third Sustainable Development Conference (SDC) from 14 – 17 December 2020 in Islamabad, Pakistan. The overarching theme of this year’s Conference is Sustainable Development in the Times of COVID-19. Read more…       FOOD SECIRITY DASHBOARD: On 4th Nov, SDPI has shared the first prototype of Food Security Dashboard with Dr Moeed Yousaf, the Special Assistant to Prime Minister on  National Security and Economic Outreach in the presence of stakeholders, including Ministry of National Food Security and Research. Provincial and district authorities attended the event in person or through zoom. The dashboard will help the government monitor and regulate the supply chain of essential food commodities.

Number of Downlaods: 26

Published Date: Nov 1, 2009

A Place for Women? Gender as a Social and Political Construct in Pakistan(W-112)

Nathalène Reynolds

November 2009

 

These brief and
therefore schematic preliminary remarks are important given the difficulty for
a foreign researcher to delve into the field of gender studies in the Islamic
Republic of Pakistan without creating doubts in the minds of Pakistanis tired
of the instrumentalization of rhetoric as to the oppression of women. It is
worth recalling that the issue of oppression had been raised long ago, notably
within the framework of the reflections that preceded the creation of Pak-i-stan, the ‘country of the pure’.
Its founding father, Mohammed Ali Jinnah, during a speech at the Muslim
University of Aligarh on 10 March 10 1944 declared that:

“No nation can rise
to the height of glory unless your women are side by side with you; we are
victims of evil customs. It is a crime against humanity that our women are shut
up within the four walls of the houses as prisoners. There is no sanction
anywhere for the deplorable condition in which our women have to live” (Pakistan: Status of Women & the
Women’s Movement,

1944).

Faced with an
international situation in which civil society as whole is concerned with the
‘reprisals’ hastily conducted against a terrorism that force alone – according
to the argument that dominates ‘Western’ public discourse – will allow us to
eradicate, there is at least one question that it is essential to raise. Does
retreat behind the ramparts of national, regional or local cultural
specificities not constitute a ruse to avoid tackling the issue of universal
values to which women – of all religions – would adhere, were it not for the
conscious efforts of various schools of opinion to stifle this line of argument
by focusing on the ‘duties’ said – by more conservative schools of thought – to
be defined in the Quran? My particular interest is in Pakistani
society: the human rights of a Muslim who considers himself to be battered by
the logic of national and international politics seem to be in opposition to
those of his ‘sister’, whom he expects to limit herself to the role defined by
society’s expectations: a society which, in turn, on the grounds of
establishing the supremacy of religious principles, generally demands the
respect of rigid patriarchal values.

The political goal
of full women’s citizenship imagined by the founder of the Republic of
Pakistan, proclaimed Islamic back in 1956, is yet to be realized. The country
seems to have descended into a parody of these goals with the promulgation in
1979 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement
of Hudood) Ordinance
. This instrument, emblematic of the intrusion of the
state’s repressive power into the private lives of believers, requires the
courts to base their decisions on a specific interpretation of the injunctions
of the Quran and the Sunnah
[1] when
returning verdicts after men and women have been found guilty of zina (i.e. to have voluntarily engaged
in sexual intercourse outside of the legal framework of a marriage – or nikah – duly authorising them to do so).
[2] Until the introduction of new
legislation[3] during the period of rule of
President Musharraf, female victims of rape had to have
the support of four male witnesses of irreproachable religious piety who were
present during the act of penetration…who presumably made no effort to
prevent the offence. If these
conditions could not be met, reporting the crime was a perilous undertaking:
the victim herself risked receiving a severe punishment, as she could be
suspected of having ceded to ‘temptations of the flesh’. The 1979 Ordinance
erased all distinction between zina
(generally translated as ‘fornication’ or ‘adultery’) and zina-bil-jabr (rape)[4],
while children who had attained puberty were considered to be capable of criminal
responsibility. The legislation adopted during 2006 clearly defines the age of
maturity, raising it to sixteen for girls and eighteen for boys; steps were
taken to free those guilty of zina. [5]

At the end of
2006, the possibility of amending or abrogating the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance provoked
opposition from the self-proclaimed defenders of the Quran and the Sunnah. It would seem
Pakistani society remains in the thrall of certain interests. Were symbolic
values associated with the woman, the couple and the family profoundly
transformed by the longest period of martial law the country has known, that
introduced by General Zia ul-Haq from July 1977 until August 1988, during which
time there was every opportunity for adherents of the patriarchal
[6] system
to promote their messianic agenda?
Whatever else, Pakistan represents an
excellent field for analysis, allowing, first and foremost, the researcher to
examine the significance of the allegory of woman in the construction of the
nation. Moreover, the interface between coloniser and colonised was through the
prism of a Manichean dialectic that I will attempt to analyze since this is a
dimension of importance for the subject of this paper (first section). Did the
promises made by the new nation remain out of the reach of women? The
religious-based parties in effect made use of a restrictive reading of sacred
texts as a source of political hegemony, as the failings of the process of
nation-building allowed them to hope to attain certain predominance (second
section). Was the role of female citizens progressively reduced to that of a
guarantor of male honor (third section)? Note that the
author spent eighteen months in the country in 2006 and 2007, travelling to
Punjab, Sind, Quetta, North West Frontier Province (NWFP) and the Northern
Areas.[7]
The author is certainly not claiming to present dramatic new material that had
somehow escaped the attention of Pakistani researchers. Drawing on accessible
material, I endeavour to present a fresh perspective on the complex
relationship between women and the state in Pakistan.


[1]        The definition offered by the site www.islam-sunnite.com is as follows:
“Sunnah: path or practice. The usual
practice of the Prophet […] including his words, actions, behavior he tacitly
approved or disapproved – what is also qualified as Hadith. The adepts of
Hadith add his personal traits (including his physical characteristics) to this
definition” (Cf.
Qu’est
ce que la Sunnah ? Réponse du Shaykh Gibril F. Haddad
– What is the Sunnah? Reply of Shaykh Gibril
F. Haddad).

We will return later to the dispute around the Sunnah.

[2]        The term hudood – the plural of hadd,
which means limit or restriction – refers to the punishments that result from
crossing those ‘limits’. This legislation, comprising five texts, limits the
eligibility of both religious minorities and Muslim females to bear witness; in
this it is based on an interpretation – that is not without ambiguity – of a
Quranic text according to which the evidence given by two women is equivalent
to that of one man
. Apart from the Offence
of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance
, the Offence Against Property (Enforcement of
Hudood) Ordinance
stipulates that the punishment for anyone guilty of
theft is amputation by a surgeon of the right hand. The Offence of Qazaf (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance deals with false
accusations of rape, a matter complicated by the discrimination against women
who may have been victims or witnesses.
The
Prohibition (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance
reinforces the
criminalisation of the consumption of alcohol that applies, since 1977, to all
Muslims. While the Penal Code stipulates punishment by six months of prison, a
fine of 5,000 rupees or both, the Ordinance requires a punishment of eighty
lashes, hence the relevance of the fifth text, the Execution of Punishment of Whipping Ordinance.
It
is intriguing to note how the judiciary tried to ‘balance’ the two legal
‘traditions’: while judging the Hudood offences outlined above, judges
stubbornly handed down ‘conventional’, prison sentences that were officially no
longer permitted, since the Penal Code had been amended.
A further
irony of the situation in Pakistan: the country continues to produce alcohol,
for example the well-known Murree Beer; in principle permits are issued only to
particular categories including non-Muslims, in reality there is a lucrative
black market. In some newspapers and magazines, one can read advertisements
offering treatment to cure addiction. It goes almost without saying that the
wealthy can usually get any charges to be ‘forgotten’.

[3]
The following: The Protection of Women (Criminal Laws Amendment) Act, 2006 (Act VI of
2006),
the Criminal Law (Amendment)
Act, 2004 (Act I of 2005),
and the Code
of Criminal Procedure (Second Amendment) Ordinance, 2006 (XXXV of 2006).

[4]
The Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance defined zina-bil-jabr as follows: “A person is said to commit zina-bil-jabr if he or she has sexual
inter-course with a woman or man, as the case may be, to whom he or she is not
validly married, in any of the following circumstances, namely: (a) against the
will of the victim; (b) without the consent of the victim; (c) with the consent
of the victim, when the consent has been obtained by putting the victim in fear
of death or of hurt; or (d) with the consent of the victim, when the offender
knows that the offender is not validly married to the victim and that the
consent is given because the victim believes that the offender is another
person to who the victim is or believes herself or himself to be validly
married. Explanation: Penetration
is sufficient to constitute the sexual intercourse necessary to the offence of zina-bil-jabr”
(section 1, Article 6).

[5]        Under the terms of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood)
Ordinance
, married women found guilty of zina were to be condemned to death by stoning; the sentence for
unmarried women was up to a maximum of one hundred lashes and ten years of
prison. In practice, the courts had been more inclined to consider admissible
the evidence of men who, content with a denial, remained at liberty. As already
indicated, the courts considered that it was sufficient to hand down a prison
sentence to convicted females.

[6]
In using the term ‘patriarchal’,
the author does not intend to associate herself with radical feminism: there is
simply no other term which so fully captures the situation in Pakistan.

[7]
I take this occasion to warmly
thank the Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) of Islamabad for
having supporting me so constantly throughout my stay in Pakistan.
There are
too many of its personnel to whom I owe gratitude for me to list them all here,
but I will thank in particular Dr. Saba Gul Khattak, who helped me through the
beginnings of the project. With the support of the SDPI, I was able to conduct
a variety of field-work, including trips in the framework of NGO projects
.
I
would also like to thank Yasmine Afridi (World Vision), Khadija Nadeem (Action
Aid) and Umbreen Griffin (Sind Development Society) in whose company I visited
villages in NWFP and Sind.