Asset 1

Global Go To Think Tank Index (GGTTI) 2020 launched                    111,75 Think Tanks across the world ranked in different categories.                SDPI is ranked 90th among “Top Think Tanks Worldwide (non-US)”.           SDPI stands 11th among Top Think Tanks in South & South East Asia & the Pacific (excluding India).            SDPI notches 33rd position in “Best New Idea or Paradigm Developed by A Think Tank” category.                SDPI remains 42nd in “Best Quality Assurance and Integrity Policies and Procedure” category.              SDPI stands 49th in “Think Tank to Watch in 2020”.            SDPI gets 52nd position among “Best Independent Think Tanks”.                           SDPI becomes 63rd in “Best Advocacy Campaign” category.                   SDPI secures 60th position in “Best Institutional Collaboration Involving Two or More Think Tanks” category.                       SDPI obtains 64th position in “Best Use of Media (Print & Electronic)” category.               SDPI gains 66th position in “Top Environment Policy Tink Tanks” category.                SDPI achieves 76th position in “Think Tanks With Best External Relations/Public Engagement Program” category.                    SDPI notches 99th position in “Top Social Policy Think Tanks”.            SDPI wins 140th position among “Top Domestic Economic Policy Think Tanks”.               SDPI is placed among special non-ranked category of Think Tanks – “Best Policy and Institutional Response to COVID-19”.                                            Owing to COVID-19 outbreak, SDPI staff is working from home from 9am to 5pm five days a week. All our staff members are available on phone, email and/or any other digital/electronic modes of communication during our usual official hours. You can also find all our work related to COVID-19 in orange entries in our publications section below.    The Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) is pleased to announce its Twenty-third Sustainable Development Conference (SDC) from 14 – 17 December 2020 in Islamabad, Pakistan. The overarching theme of this year’s Conference is Sustainable Development in the Times of COVID-19. Read more…       FOOD SECIRITY DASHBOARD: On 4th Nov, SDPI has shared the first prototype of Food Security Dashboard with Dr Moeed Yousaf, the Special Assistant to Prime Minister on  National Security and Economic Outreach in the presence of stakeholders, including Ministry of National Food Security and Research. Provincial and district authorities attended the event in person or through zoom. The dashboard will help the government monitor and regulate the supply chain of essential food commodities.

Number of Downlaods: 14

Published Date: Feb 2, 1994

A Sectoral and Process Oriented Approach to the Human Rights Agenda in Pakistan (P-21)

Ahmed Afzal, SDPI
1994

Beyond a Narrowly Defined Sectoral Approach

The human rights agenda in Pakistan is presently based on the assumption that all sectors requiring human rights protection, vis-a-vis their vulnerability to human rights violation, have been pre-determined and processes for their defence established.  Pre-dominant in the groups and communities included in human rights advocacy are women, children and religious and ethnic minorities.  Further, the framework of protection required by these communities has often been defined by individuals and policy makers who have no or relatively little at stake as far as their own vulnerability to human rights abuse is concerned.  The present human rights agenda also assumes that  the government is the sole agent that can provide protection and enable processes such as legislation, public interest litigation and legal institutions to be effective.  Thus the processes available reflect a focus primarily on  public sector agencies to respond to specific human rights violation and abuse.

The present approach to human rights defence and protection in Pakistan is at once, both narrowly defined sectorally and limited by the absence of processes that can protect against specific human rights violations.  Without the inclusion of the diverse needs of specific sectors and utilization of processes for their defence and protection, this limited approach has reduced the effectiveness and efficiency of human rights advocacy.  Specifically, two perspectives are crucial in outlining an integrative approach to human rights support and defence in Pakistan; first, identification of sectors vulnerable to human rights violation, and second, development of processes including amendment of existing legislation, and forums such as public interest litigation to maximize this protection and defence.   Within this framework, it is important to realize the specific needs of each sector and how the processes can be utilized most effectively.