Asset 1

Global Go To Think Tank Index (GGTTI) 2020 launched                    111,75 Think Tanks across the world ranked in different categories.                SDPI is ranked 90th among “Top Think Tanks Worldwide (non-US)”.           SDPI stands 11th among Top Think Tanks in South & South East Asia & the Pacific (excluding India).            SDPI notches 33rd position in “Best New Idea or Paradigm Developed by A Think Tank” category.                SDPI remains 42nd in “Best Quality Assurance and Integrity Policies and Procedure” category.              SDPI stands 49th in “Think Tank to Watch in 2020”.            SDPI gets 52nd position among “Best Independent Think Tanks”.                           SDPI becomes 63rd in “Best Advocacy Campaign” category.                   SDPI secures 60th position in “Best Institutional Collaboration Involving Two or More Think Tanks” category.                       SDPI obtains 64th position in “Best Use of Media (Print & Electronic)” category.               SDPI gains 66th position in “Top Environment Policy Tink Tanks” category.                SDPI achieves 76th position in “Think Tanks With Best External Relations/Public Engagement Program” category.                    SDPI notches 99th position in “Top Social Policy Think Tanks”.            SDPI wins 140th position among “Top Domestic Economic Policy Think Tanks”.               SDPI is placed among special non-ranked category of Think Tanks – “Best Policy and Institutional Response to COVID-19”.                                            Owing to COVID-19 outbreak, SDPI staff is working from home from 9am to 5pm five days a week. All our staff members are available on phone, email and/or any other digital/electronic modes of communication during our usual official hours. You can also find all our work related to COVID-19 in orange entries in our publications section below.    The Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) is pleased to announce its Twenty-third Sustainable Development Conference (SDC) from 14 – 17 December 2020 in Islamabad, Pakistan. The overarching theme of this year’s Conference is Sustainable Development in the Times of COVID-19. Read more…       FOOD SECIRITY DASHBOARD: On 4th Nov, SDPI has shared the first prototype of Food Security Dashboard with Dr Moeed Yousaf, the Special Assistant to Prime Minister on  National Security and Economic Outreach in the presence of stakeholders, including Ministry of National Food Security and Research. Provincial and district authorities attended the event in person or through zoom. The dashboard will help the government monitor and regulate the supply chain of essential food commodities.

Number of Downlaods: 37

Published Date: Mar 31, 1998

Environmental Evaluation and Accounting:The Case of Pakistan’s Forests (W-29)

Yorrick Da Silva, Mozaffar Qizilbash, SDPI
1998

Introduction

There have been different ways of reacting to the possibility that the growth of per capita GNP can conflict with the conservation of the environment. One leading response, associated with the economist David Pearce amongst others,  involves arguing that GNP does not, as it stands, measure the well-being of present and future members of society. This response suggests that if GNP is adjusted so that it reflects the “sustainable income” or “sustainable well-being” of society, there is no necessary conflict between income growth and the conservation of the environment. Indeed, if countries adopt such measures of income or well-being, and aim to maximise these, their development will, it is suggested, be sustainable. An important distinctive feature of the idea of  sustainable development , certainly as it was formulated by the World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) was this assumption that growth of income was compatible with the conservation of the environment.

The challenge to those who adopt this approach is to find ways of measuring the value of the environment, certainly inasmuch as it matters for human well-being. Furthermore, for those who wish to adjust the national income accounts to incorporate environmental concerns the need is to reduce this valuation exercise into some hard monetary figures. This is difficult since much of what we value in the environment is hard to express in monetary terms. Furthermore, environmental resources are often not bought and sold on the market, and market prices have typically been used in the national accounts. Nonetheless, the valuation of environmental resources is the key challenge for those involved in environmental evaluation and accounting.

The pursuit of such exercises can clearly be questioned on methodological grounds. However, there is a strong policy-oriented argument for pursuing them. Inasmuch as GNP per capita is the figure that most policy makers focus on, it is here that the focus of environmental critiques must be concentrated. If unadjusted and adjusted GNP show divergent time paths this is a serious cause for concern, and should have an impact on policy formulation.

In this report our concern is with attempts to apply these methods in the case of the forests in Pakistan. In section 1, we present a critical review of certain dominant techniques used to value environmental resources. In section 2, we present a similar review of the related literature on environmentally adjusted,  green  national accounts. In section 3, we run through some of the reasons why the forests are valuable. In section 4, we describe the situation as regards the forests in Pakistan today. In section 5, we discuss attempts to use some of the methods of environmental valuation and accounting described in earlier sections to evaluate the cost of deforestation in Pakistan and of environmental degradation, as well as other proposals involving forest accounting, and policies for sustainable forest management. Section 6 concludes.