Asset 1

Global Go To Think Tank Index (GGTTI) 2020 launched                    111,75 Think Tanks across the world ranked in different categories.                SDPI is ranked 90th among “Top Think Tanks Worldwide (non-US)”.           SDPI stands 11th among Top Think Tanks in South & South East Asia & the Pacific (excluding India).            SDPI notches 33rd position in “Best New Idea or Paradigm Developed by A Think Tank” category.                SDPI remains 42nd in “Best Quality Assurance and Integrity Policies and Procedure” category.              SDPI stands 49th in “Think Tank to Watch in 2020”.            SDPI gets 52nd position among “Best Independent Think Tanks”.                           SDPI becomes 63rd in “Best Advocacy Campaign” category.                   SDPI secures 60th position in “Best Institutional Collaboration Involving Two or More Think Tanks” category.                       SDPI obtains 64th position in “Best Use of Media (Print & Electronic)” category.               SDPI gains 66th position in “Top Environment Policy Tink Tanks” category.                SDPI achieves 76th position in “Think Tanks With Best External Relations/Public Engagement Program” category.                    SDPI notches 99th position in “Top Social Policy Think Tanks”.            SDPI wins 140th position among “Top Domestic Economic Policy Think Tanks”.               SDPI is placed among special non-ranked category of Think Tanks – “Best Policy and Institutional Response to COVID-19”.                                            Owing to COVID-19 outbreak, SDPI staff is working from home from 9am to 5pm five days a week. All our staff members are available on phone, email and/or any other digital/electronic modes of communication during our usual official hours. You can also find all our work related to COVID-19 in orange entries in our publications section below.    The Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) is pleased to announce its Twenty-third Sustainable Development Conference (SDC) from 14 – 17 December 2020 in Islamabad, Pakistan. The overarching theme of this year’s Conference is Sustainable Development in the Times of COVID-19. Read more…       FOOD SECIRITY DASHBOARD: On 4th Nov, SDPI has shared the first prototype of Food Security Dashboard with Dr Moeed Yousaf, the Special Assistant to Prime Minister on  National Security and Economic Outreach in the presence of stakeholders, including Ministry of National Food Security and Research. Provincial and district authorities attended the event in person or through zoom. The dashboard will help the government monitor and regulate the supply chain of essential food commodities.

Number of Downlaods: 12

Published Date: May 1, 2010

Forest Management Paradigms and Resource Rights in Historical Perspective: Evidence from the Swat District, Pakistan(W-116)

Talimand Khan

 

This paper focuses on forest management
systems and resource rights in three different geographical zones of Swat
District, Pakistan. Each zone has distinctive social and historical characteristics
in relation to forest management and resource rights and their impact on
conservation and sustainable use of the forest resources. Further, the paper
analyzes three peculiar historical regimes with regard to their management
mechanisms, resource rights, and the transition from one regime to another. It
is argued that the interplay between geography and management schemes drive the
use of forest resources in the Swat District.

The paper makes some comparisons between
informal (community) management and management by formal (state institutions)
and finds that inclusion or exclusion criteria regarding resource rights laid
down by a particular management system create
situations that lead either to a sense of ownership or deprivation
among  stakeholders.  Another finding is that the management of
forests in the Swat District changed from community to formal institutions
which could not maintain the balance between the customary and statutory
resource rights arrangements. As a result, conflicting interests created an
opaque resource rights situation that prompted predatory attitudes among the
various stakeholders. The paper recommends renegotiating the resource rights
regime coupled with changes in the role of the Forest Department (a state
institution) from a command and control approach to that of a facilitator in
the process of forest management. ­ Developing alternative energy sources,
particularly in the forested areas, may also help to conserve forest
resources.