Asset 1

Global Go To Think Tank Index (GGTTI) 2020 launched                    111,75 Think Tanks across the world ranked in different categories.                SDPI is ranked 90th among “Top Think Tanks Worldwide (non-US)”.           SDPI stands 11th among Top Think Tanks in South & South East Asia & the Pacific (excluding India).            SDPI notches 33rd position in “Best New Idea or Paradigm Developed by A Think Tank” category.                SDPI remains 42nd in “Best Quality Assurance and Integrity Policies and Procedure” category.              SDPI stands 49th in “Think Tank to Watch in 2020”.            SDPI gets 52nd position among “Best Independent Think Tanks”.                           SDPI becomes 63rd in “Best Advocacy Campaign” category.                   SDPI secures 60th position in “Best Institutional Collaboration Involving Two or More Think Tanks” category.                       SDPI obtains 64th position in “Best Use of Media (Print & Electronic)” category.               SDPI gains 66th position in “Top Environment Policy Tink Tanks” category.                SDPI achieves 76th position in “Think Tanks With Best External Relations/Public Engagement Program” category.                    SDPI notches 99th position in “Top Social Policy Think Tanks”.            SDPI wins 140th position among “Top Domestic Economic Policy Think Tanks”.               SDPI is placed among special non-ranked category of Think Tanks – “Best Policy and Institutional Response to COVID-19”.                                            Owing to COVID-19 outbreak, SDPI staff is working from home from 9am to 5pm five days a week. All our staff members are available on phone, email and/or any other digital/electronic modes of communication during our usual official hours. You can also find all our work related to COVID-19 in orange entries in our publications section below.    The Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) is pleased to announce its Twenty-third Sustainable Development Conference (SDC) from 14 – 17 December 2020 in Islamabad, Pakistan. The overarching theme of this year’s Conference is Sustainable Development in the Times of COVID-19. Read more…       FOOD SECIRITY DASHBOARD: On 4th Nov, SDPI has shared the first prototype of Food Security Dashboard with Dr Moeed Yousaf, the Special Assistant to Prime Minister on  National Security and Economic Outreach in the presence of stakeholders, including Ministry of National Food Security and Research. Provincial and district authorities attended the event in person or through zoom. The dashboard will help the government monitor and regulate the supply chain of essential food commodities.

Number of Downlaods: 34

Published Date: Nov 1, 1992

Human Capital, Governance and the Transfer of Technology (W-4)


The failure of economic and social development in the developing countries resides in the inconsistent policies, failure to take up and fulfil responsibility, inefficiency and  encouraged waste by the leaders. This paper suggests that transfer of technology in this declining environment would facilitate and encourage economic development. It examines what technology is and also considers the recent dominant trends in technological development. Since transfer implies an act that has to be conducted by some agent, the next issue is of who should effect the said transfer? The answer to this question involves a consideration of the role of government in either directly helping in the transfer or in inducing such a transfer. A by-product of this issue is how the multinational and the indigenous private sector could interact to achieve a transfer of technology. If looked at from this standpoint, how does this issue differ from that of the related issue of foreign direct investment which is going to be an issue of critical importance in the coming years. Given the importance of attracting foreign direct investment, the next consideration should be the economic, political and social factors that could help attract foreign direct investment into the country. Finally, it is argued that, in essence, transfer of technology may be no more than a strong social and policy emphasis on the development of human capital. The paper closes with a discussion of the appropriate policy for the development of human capital.

As the fervour of nationalism in the newly independent colonies died down without yielding the promised rapid economic and social development, there was a scampering for alternative explanations. The tendency was to place the blame squarely on the external environment as the young nations and their leaders continued to exploit the legacy of colonialism to evade their own responsibilities and failures. Thus, through the sixties and seventies, transfer of technology, import substitution, self-reliance, the North-South dialogue and various other such areas that concentrated on blaming the lack of progress on factors other than domestic policy failures were in vogue. Such thinking ignored the fact that developing economies allowed all manner of institution to decline, encouraged waste, inefficiency and rent seeking, maintained inconsistent economic policies, incurred exorbitant defence expenditures, and virtually allowed their human capital to decline, especially if quality considerations are borne in mind.  Somehow, in this environment of social, political and economic decline, transfer of technology would allow the forces of economic development to be unleashed.

Experience, however, proved otherwise and by the end of the seventies, observers had begun to record that "what seemed at first to be technological obstacles to development frequently turn out on closer examination to have been policy failures" (Weiss 1979). An important element of this paper is to attempt a determination of what policy can and cannot accomplish in this area.

Since this subject was in vogue, considerable technological as well as political changes have taken place in the light of which perhaps the issue ought to be re-examined. For example while the growth of electronics, telecommunication and computers has revolutionized our notion of technology, and demise of communism as an extant political system has changed our attitudes to the functioning of the economy and the role of the government in the economy. It is with these factors in mind that this paper has been written.