Asset 1

Global Go To Think Tank Index (GGTTI) 2020 launched                    111,75 Think Tanks across the world ranked in different categories.                SDPI is ranked 90th among “Top Think Tanks Worldwide (non-US)”.           SDPI stands 11th among Top Think Tanks in South & South East Asia & the Pacific (excluding India).            SDPI notches 33rd position in “Best New Idea or Paradigm Developed by A Think Tank” category.                SDPI remains 42nd in “Best Quality Assurance and Integrity Policies and Procedure” category.              SDPI stands 49th in “Think Tank to Watch in 2020”.            SDPI gets 52nd position among “Best Independent Think Tanks”.                           SDPI becomes 63rd in “Best Advocacy Campaign” category.                   SDPI secures 60th position in “Best Institutional Collaboration Involving Two or More Think Tanks” category.                       SDPI obtains 64th position in “Best Use of Media (Print & Electronic)” category.               SDPI gains 66th position in “Top Environment Policy Tink Tanks” category.                SDPI achieves 76th position in “Think Tanks With Best External Relations/Public Engagement Program” category.                    SDPI notches 99th position in “Top Social Policy Think Tanks”.            SDPI wins 140th position among “Top Domestic Economic Policy Think Tanks”.               SDPI is placed among special non-ranked category of Think Tanks – “Best Policy and Institutional Response to COVID-19”.                                            Owing to COVID-19 outbreak, SDPI staff is working from home from 9am to 5pm five days a week. All our staff members are available on phone, email and/or any other digital/electronic modes of communication during our usual official hours. You can also find all our work related to COVID-19 in orange entries in our publications section below.    The Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) is pleased to announce its Twenty-third Sustainable Development Conference (SDC) from 14 – 17 December 2020 in Islamabad, Pakistan. The overarching theme of this year’s Conference is Sustainable Development in the Times of COVID-19. Read more…       FOOD SECIRITY DASHBOARD: On 4th Nov, SDPI has shared the first prototype of Food Security Dashboard with Dr Moeed Yousaf, the Special Assistant to Prime Minister on  National Security and Economic Outreach in the presence of stakeholders, including Ministry of National Food Security and Research. Provincial and district authorities attended the event in person or through zoom. The dashboard will help the government monitor and regulate the supply chain of essential food commodities.

Number of Downlaods: 13

Published Date: Jan 30, 2018

IRTI Policy Paper Series: The Interlinkage between Social Exclusion and Financial Inclusion: Evidence from Pakistan

Nasim Shah Shirazi, Dr. Sajid Amin Javed, Dawood Ashraf

Abstract

Using the data from Pakistan Panel Household Survey (2010), this paper assesses the role of financial

inclusion in reducing social exclusion. The findings from regression analysis confirm a statistically

significant negative impact of financial inclusion on social exclusion including deep

[multidimensional] social exclusion. Deep exclusion for population having financial inclusion drops

to 34.8% from 81% otherwise. Most importantly, none of the women was found having deep social

exclusion if she has access to financial services. Results from logistic regression analysis confirm that

having access to finacial services lowers the likelihood of facing marginal exclusion by 0.54 times

and deep exclusion by 0.28 times compared to those having no access. Further, results from sum score

method corroborate that Pakistan has higher prevalence of minor and marginal exclusion as compared

to deep [multidimensional] social exclusion. The evidence further suggests that rather than income

and consumption, old age, low education and gender contribute to multidimensional social exclusion

mainly. The ratio of population within age groups 35-44 and 45-54 facing the multidimensional

exclusion is 53.1% and 70.8% while the number rises to 85.5% and 80.5% for age groups 55-64 and

65 and above. Similarly, percentage of population with only primary education facing

multidimensional social exclusion is 36% as compared to 4.7% for population having a degree.

Finally, 23.3% of women face multidimensional exclusion as compared to 14.1% of men. We

conclude that government needs to rethink the social design as well as to ensure improved access to

financial services.