Asset 1

Global Go To Think Tank Index (GGTTI) 2020 launched                    111,75 Think Tanks across the world ranked in different categories.                SDPI is ranked 90th among “Top Think Tanks Worldwide (non-US)”.           SDPI stands 11th among Top Think Tanks in South & South East Asia & the Pacific (excluding India).            SDPI notches 33rd position in “Best New Idea or Paradigm Developed by A Think Tank” category.                SDPI remains 42nd in “Best Quality Assurance and Integrity Policies and Procedure” category.              SDPI stands 49th in “Think Tank to Watch in 2020”.            SDPI gets 52nd position among “Best Independent Think Tanks”.                           SDPI becomes 63rd in “Best Advocacy Campaign” category.                   SDPI secures 60th position in “Best Institutional Collaboration Involving Two or More Think Tanks” category.                       SDPI obtains 64th position in “Best Use of Media (Print & Electronic)” category.               SDPI gains 66th position in “Top Environment Policy Tink Tanks” category.                SDPI achieves 76th position in “Think Tanks With Best External Relations/Public Engagement Program” category.                    SDPI notches 99th position in “Top Social Policy Think Tanks”.            SDPI wins 140th position among “Top Domestic Economic Policy Think Tanks”.               SDPI is placed among special non-ranked category of Think Tanks – “Best Policy and Institutional Response to COVID-19”.                                            Owing to COVID-19 outbreak, SDPI staff is working from home from 9am to 5pm five days a week. All our staff members are available on phone, email and/or any other digital/electronic modes of communication during our usual official hours. You can also find all our work related to COVID-19 in orange entries in our publications section below.    The Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) is pleased to announce its Twenty-third Sustainable Development Conference (SDC) from 14 – 17 December 2020 in Islamabad, Pakistan. The overarching theme of this year’s Conference is Sustainable Development in the Times of COVID-19. Read more…       FOOD SECIRITY DASHBOARD: On 4th Nov, SDPI has shared the first prototype of Food Security Dashboard with Dr Moeed Yousaf, the Special Assistant to Prime Minister on  National Security and Economic Outreach in the presence of stakeholders, including Ministry of National Food Security and Research. Provincial and district authorities attended the event in person or through zoom. The dashboard will help the government monitor and regulate the supply chain of essential food commodities.

Number of Downlaods: 13

Published Date: May 15, 1998

University Faculty’s Share in Goods and Services in Pakistan (W-32)

Tariq Rahman, SDPI
1998

Introduction

This study compares the renumeration of academics with bureaucrats and military officers in Pakistan.  In this pilot study only the academics at the Quaid-i-Azam University (Islamabad) have been compared with bureaucrats and military officers in Rawalpindi-Islamabad.  A comparison on similar lines was carried out earlier by the government (Annex A).  It was issued in July 1997 but the renumeration of employees worked out in it is lower for senior officers than the one worked out in this paper (Annex B). A study of the `aggregate emoluments of the Federal Government Employees over the period 1977-78 to 1991- 92′ was also carried out by Faiz Bilquees (1994).  In conclusion Bilquees concluded that the emoluments should be increased.  However, she did not take some of the perquisites of the officers into account nor did she compare them with the emoluments of military officers and academics.

In this study the calculation is not necessarily cost to the state but how much the individual would have paid for enjoying the goods and services — called `tangible gratifications’ here — had he/she obtained them on payment.  Tangible gratifications include, besides the salary and allowances, such things as accommodation, telephone, transport, medical facilities, domestic help, driver and so on.  These have been monetized i.e a price tag has been fixed upon them.  Generally, the price tag is what the good or service in question costs to the public.  In some cases, however, other criteria have been used.  All calculations are approximations and are subject to revision and correction.

Only tangible means of gratification — salary, allowances, accommodation, phone, car and medical care — have been taken into account.  Intangible ones — exercise of power, prestige, pleasure in work, autonomy and nature of work — have not been monetized or measured.  Their importance, however, cannot be denied and quantifying them is a challenge for further work in this area.