Asset 1

Global Go To Think Tank Index (GGTTI) 2020 launched                    111,75 Think Tanks across the world ranked in different categories.                SDPI is ranked 90th among “Top Think Tanks Worldwide (non-US)”.           SDPI stands 11th among Top Think Tanks in South & South East Asia & the Pacific (excluding India).            SDPI notches 33rd position in “Best New Idea or Paradigm Developed by A Think Tank” category.                SDPI remains 42nd in “Best Quality Assurance and Integrity Policies and Procedure” category.              SDPI stands 49th in “Think Tank to Watch in 2020”.            SDPI gets 52nd position among “Best Independent Think Tanks”.                           SDPI becomes 63rd in “Best Advocacy Campaign” category.                   SDPI secures 60th position in “Best Institutional Collaboration Involving Two or More Think Tanks” category.                       SDPI obtains 64th position in “Best Use of Media (Print & Electronic)” category.               SDPI gains 66th position in “Top Environment Policy Tink Tanks” category.                SDPI achieves 76th position in “Think Tanks With Best External Relations/Public Engagement Program” category.                    SDPI notches 99th position in “Top Social Policy Think Tanks”.            SDPI wins 140th position among “Top Domestic Economic Policy Think Tanks”.               SDPI is placed among special non-ranked category of Think Tanks – “Best Policy and Institutional Response to COVID-19”.                                            Owing to COVID-19 outbreak, SDPI staff is working from home from 9am to 5pm five days a week. All our staff members are available on phone, email and/or any other digital/electronic modes of communication during our usual official hours. You can also find all our work related to COVID-19 in orange entries in our publications section below.    The Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) is pleased to announce its Twenty-third Sustainable Development Conference (SDC) from 14 – 17 December 2020 in Islamabad, Pakistan. The overarching theme of this year’s Conference is Sustainable Development in the Times of COVID-19. Read more…       FOOD SECIRITY DASHBOARD: On 4th Nov, SDPI has shared the first prototype of Food Security Dashboard with Dr Moeed Yousaf, the Special Assistant to Prime Minister on  National Security and Economic Outreach in the presence of stakeholders, including Ministry of National Food Security and Research. Provincial and district authorities attended the event in person or through zoom. The dashboard will help the government monitor and regulate the supply chain of essential food commodities.

Number of Downlaods: 26

Published Date: Jul 1, 2004

Urban Women Rebels: Voices of Dissent in Urdu Popular Fiction(W-92)

Kiran Nazir Ahmed

2004

The purpose of my paper is to bring forth and highlight, ‘alternative’ stories, written predominantly by and for women, that are published in Urdu popular digests. This is a particular narrative of dissent which questions socially constituted ideals for women, deals with ‘serious’ issues such as the value of women’s economic empowerment, preference for sons over daughters and child sexual abuse.

I do not make the claim that (a) popular digests for women have become progressive and there is a ‘revolution’ of sorts taking place in them. Instead, I assert that (b) all the stories printed in these digests do not propagate socially constituted ideals, ‘voices of dissent’ are also present. Therefore the conception of women’s popular digests in Urdu, as only catering to a demand for easy reading and reinforcing the gender status quo is not true.
I have divided this paper into six sections. The first section puts the paper in context by portraying the significance of this topic. The second section illustrates the hierarchical distinction between literature and popular literature. The third section examines the two studies that have been conducted on Urdu popular fiction for women. It concludes that they only portray the majority viewpoints, minority viewpoints are ignored. The fourth section presents a brief historical background of women’s digests. The fifth section discusses the viewpoints of the editors of the two publications selected for this paper. The last section presents extracts from stories, which depict women’s recognition of injustice and a questioning of socially constituted ideals.