Pakistan’s power sector is living through a paradox. On the one hand, rooftop solar has become the most organic energy reform the country has ever witnessed, financed by households, powered by falling global module prices, and accelerated by affordability concerns. On the other hand, recent amend ments to the net-metering regime by the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) and the policy posture of the Ministry of Energy (Power Division) suggest an institu tional discomfort with this bottom-up transition. The result may not be stabilisation, but a classic J-curve. The J-curve phenomenon, borrowed from trade and macroeconomics, describes an initial deterioration before eventual improvement. The dynamic is less a J-curve of temporary pain followed by recovery, and more a short-term stabilisation masking long-term disengagement. By tightening export compensation through net-billing and lower buyback rates, the grid’s immediate revenue losses may slow as prosumer growth is curtailed. On paper, this can appear as fiscal relief. Yet the altered incentive structure encourages consumers to maximise self-consump-tion rather than abandon solar altogether. Higher-income households add batteries, commercial users redesign load profiles, and over time, even middle-income clusters reduce reliance on the grid. Atempting to suppress its adoption through tariff spreads will likely deepen off-grid autonomy via BESS Thus, while short-run losses to the national grid may decline, the long-run outcome could be more struc- tural: gradual but decisive movement toward complete or near-complete off-grid autonomy through Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS), leaving the grid with a narrower and more vulnerable consumer base. This trajectory reflects a deeper philosophical fault line in planning. The prevailing doctrine within the Power Division remains capacity-centric, rooted in a legacy model of centralised expansion under long-term contracts. Planning documents emphasise megawatts installed rather than megawatts utilised; capacity payments rather than system flexibility; and procurement rather than opti- misation. Solar proliferation is treated as a disruption rather than a structural signal. And yet, the demand decline is not evidence of decentralisation triumph, but evidence of price failure. Consumers are not exiting the grid out of ideology; they are escaping tariff distress. The autonomy of Nepra also merits scrutiny. A regulator’s legitimacy rests on independence, evidence-based deliberation, and full institutional quorum. Major recalibrations to prosumer regulations, particularly when they affect investment behaviour and financial flows, should emerge from comprehensive cost-of-service studies and transparent modelling. An integrated response requires reimagining external financing as well. Under the World Bank Country Partnership Framework, an outcome linked to an additional 10GW of installed capacity reflects an outdated premise: that supply expansion is the central constraint. Pakistan today suffers not from insufficient capacity, but from excess contracted generation with low utilisation. The government should proactively negotiate a reori- entation of this envelope. Rather than adding megawatts, concessional resources can modernise transmission corridors, deploy grid-scale BESS, upgrade dispatch software, and invest in advanced metering infrastructure. In doing so, rooftop solar becomes an asset rather than a liability, absorbed during midday, discharged during evening peaks, and orchestrated through digital control systems. Similarly, subsidy reform under the International Monetary Fund programme requires nuance. The removal of tariff subsidies for protected consumers, with com- pensation channelled through Benazir Income Support Programme cash transfers, is fiscally unsustainable and politically fragile. Cash grants indexed imperfectly to volatile tariffs will struggle to maintain purchasing power. A more durable solution lies in asset-based protection: providing eligible protected households with standardised rooftop solar kits, small lithium or sodium-ion batteries, and high-efficiency DC fans. The capital expenditure is front-loaded but reduces recurring subsidy liabilities. It shields vulnerable consumers from tariff shocks, cuts peak demand, and aligns social protection with climate objectives. In energy policy, ownership can be more empowering than compensation. Beyond households, surplus green eleCtricity should be strategically directed toward export-oriented industry via the Competitive Trading Bilateral Contracts Market. As the European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism tightens compliance for embedded emissions, Pakistan’s industrial competitiveness will hinge on credible decarbonisation pathways. Dedicated green feeders, backed by renewable generation and storage, can enable steel, cement, and textiles to certify lower carbon intensity. The most innovative pillar of integrated planning lies in repurposing underutilised coal plants. Several imported coal facilities operate at low-capacity factors yet carry heavy fixed obligations. Instead of perpetuating stranded assets, selected sites can be converted into grid scale BESS hubs. Pakistan’s solar saga is therefore not a tale of excess panels or regulatory anxiety. It is a test of planning philosophy. The choice is between defending an eroding paradigm or orchestrating a coordinated transition, where distributed generation, centralised infrastructure, and climate finance reinforce rather than undermine each other. Integrated planning is not about adding more capacity; it is about adding coherence. Oil & Gas Development Company Limited (OGDC) on Monday announced a second interim cash dividend of Rs4.25 per share for the half year ended December 31, 2025, taking the cumulative payout for the period to a record Rs7.75 per share. The dividend, approved at a meeting of the company’s Board of Directors, represents the highest-ever second quarterly dividend in OGDC’s history and marks its largest half-year payout to shareholders. The company reported net sales revenue of Rs192.83 billion and profit after tax of Rs73.02 billion, translating into earnings per share (EPS) of Rs 16.98. The results were shaped by forced production curtailments by SNGPL and UPL due to system load constraints, as well as lower average crude oil basket prices. These pressures were partially offset by higher realized gas prices and favourable exchange rate movements. OGDC said it contributed Rs 120 billion to the national exchequer during the period through corporate taxes, dividends, royalties and other levies. Its oil and gas output also generated estimated foreign exchange savings of $1.4 billion by substituting imports. Average daily net saleable production during the half year stood at 31,848 barrels of crude oil, 626 million cubic feet (mmcf) of natural gas, and 636 tonnes of LPG. In comparison, output during the same period last year averaged 31,477 barrels of oil, 672 mmcf of gas, and 629 tons of LPG per day. Production curtailments reduced daily net output by 3,384 barrels of oil, 152 mmcf of gas, and 51 tons of LPG.
© 2026 SDPI. All Rights Reserved Design & Developed by NKMIS WEB Unit
